No steroid allegations + magic number 3,000 = HOF. I don't see how being the best player on your team matters. He was one of the best 2B in the business for a long, long time. Plus, come on. Mazeroski got in on .260 BA, .299 OBP(!!), .367 SLG. Nobody can tell me Craig's .282/.365/.434 doesn't blow that out of the water 6 ways to Sunday. Bigs played longer, too. Without commenting on Biggio's qualifications, we're not really using Maz as the baseline, are we? He's in, isn't he? It's a 2B comparison, Maz is in and Bigs will be voted on. How is that not a valid comparison? Not my fault the voters put Maz in. The vets put Maz in, not the BBWAA. Biggio should be in easily, and Maz shouldn't have to come into the conversation to prove it. Whatever. In is in, who cares which voting body put him there. I never said who would vote him in, or when, and it doesn't matter in any event. Just because he got in somehow, doesn't mean they should make future mistakes by using him as the baseline. I'm pretty sure Biggio is in pretty good company statistically among second basemen. Bill James ranked him as the fifth best 2b of all time in his Historical Baseball Abstract as of his 2000 season.