I don't agree with the part about Pedro. Neither Maddux or Clemens was as good as Pedro was in their prime. I'd probably go: 1. Clemens 2A. Maddux 2B. Pedro 4. Unit Don't misunderstand me, I think Pedro is great and "stuff" wise he may be better than all of them, that's why I prefaced my remarks by saying "for their body of work". I don't think Pedro will aproach anywhere near the amount of wins or the longevity of any of the guys I mentioned. His durability, when compared to them also comes into play. edit: I know, I know, wins are more of a team stat, but I think over the course of a career they can be used to compare to some degree.