I don't get that statement. Without Albert Pujols, aren't the Cardinals... the White Sox? He's clearly the smartest and best hitter on the team, and I can't imagine Eckstien, Edmonds, and Sanders being good enough and consistent enough to make them good. The just become a team relying on scrappy hitters, fast runners, and lots of homeruns for run production. Well, seeing as how the Sox have the best record in baseball... I don't know if the Sox are a smoke and mirrors team, but I'm starting to believe that they're the real deal. Like I said in another thread, I think the Sox are alot like the 2000 Mariners. The thing that is lacking is their offense. It is fine now, but in a short series agains a staff with a couple of ace type starters, they may be dead, IMO. The have many good hitters, but no great hitters. They lack the type of offensive players that can produce runs even when facing an ace on top of his game. The Cards have Pujols and when he is healthy, Walker that fit this bill - a hitter with no glaring holes. I would say Edmonds, but if you have a pitcher who is locating very well, he can be neutralized. The Sox have a lineup full of role players, but no stud (Frank is past his prime). I agree with a lot of that. I like the Sox as a team this year, but they are far from a perfect team. The second lowest team BA in the league jumps out at me. They're going to make the playoffs, but I don't see them winning, or even going to the Series. I think the Angels are "THE" team in the AL. My girlfriend is a Sox fan, so it will save my relationship if they don't and the Cards do ;)