Jump to content
North Side Baseball

CubinNY

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    27,596
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by CubinNY

  1. I always want the Cubs to win. That's why it hurts so much when they lose. I would like nothing more than for Baker to be a genius, Rothschild to be better than Mazzone, and Sarge to be the reincarnation of Walt Rheniak. I have invested too much over the years to wish for anything else.
  2. This says it all: I'd love to see ZZThorn back for a day to defend Baker.
  3. couldn't resist! What's wrong with that? It's a highly likely scenario and I don't see it as a terrible excuse. Good Lord. What's wrong with it? It's another excuse that Dusty is using to defend the team's poor play. There is no excuse for this team to have the record it has, but Dusty will do his best to try and find it.
  4. What?? Lee?? Zambrano??? They are the cornerstones of our team! Why should we trade them? And like someone else already said, We're not like the Marlins or Nationals who need to dump salary and start from scratch with all young guys. Don't forget, not all minor leaguers are ready at the same time. To dump all our players...espescially the core of our team like, Lee and Z would be huge mistake! BTW, sorry if this sounds too harsh! I had to respond as soon as I read the first part of this post. Reading is Fundamental
  5. Do they have the DH? If not and he was batting in the 8 slot, that would make sense. If not, I have no idea why they'd ptich around him.
  6. Post of the month
  7. They have to fire Dusty after this series. This team is DOA.
  8. I predictied this last year. That being said, until the WS start losing more than they win, they won't let him go. I'd bet a lot of money that he won't be with the team two years from today.
  9. Jeez, 4 walks in one game? Have the Cubs released him yet? His stat line so far this young season: .176/.481/.176/.657 That IsoD is Dunnesque. Now if he can just get that slugging up. If he's anything like pops he won't be hitting for much power.
  10. That is not a brain cramp. With the Cubs, that is a way of life. And he was out by 10+ feet
  11. Stupid, stupid, stupid. Fast Freddie Bynum! :pukel:
  12. For sure Murton hasn't been playing well against righties. But it is hard to get RBI with the OBP the Cubs have. Nevertheless, he's playing much better then the guy next to him and yet he's still at the top of the order grounding out to someone in the infield every AB.
  13. Steve Stone.
  14. It's almost as if he creates lineups based on some sterotypical "way" that a line up is supposed to be created. It goes like this regardless of who is filling the position CF 2nd 1st 3rd LF RF SS C P I am still sore that they've given up on Murton after less than half a season. I guess when Murton doesn't do well in his career all the Dusty appologists will use the tired "he sucked after he left the Cubs" excuse. When if was the Cubs that stunted his development.
  15. I want out but they keep pulling me back in.
  16. the Save is perhaps the most worthless stat in baseball, right after the Win. Suppose the Cubs are up 2-1, it is the sixth inning runners on second and third with one out and the starting pitcher just walked the bases loaded. Weurtz comes in and strikes out the next batter and gets the final batter to fly out to CF. Now, same score the bottom of the 9, nobody on, no outs. Dempster pitches a 1-2-3 ninth and gets the save. Which outs where the most valuable? Reserving your best pitcher for the bottom of the ninth is convential baseball wisdom. Sure, there are guys like Rivera and Gagne but those guys are rare.
  17. What? Every pitcher that was in the Top 5 in PAP 2003 hasn't been the same since. Livan pitched better than his career numbers, the other two got worse but Redman wasn't that good anyway. That's not really convincing. I'm not saying abuse has no effect at all. Typically, the pitcher has a bad next year or gets hurt the next year and recovers. Show me a decent number of examples from the last 10 years where the pitcher got abused in one season and followed it up by a dramatic decline in quality and quantity of starts for a number of years or the rest of his career. Wood's just been run into the ground for over a decade, so I can write that off as a unique situation. I still haven't seen anything comparable to Prior that offers a definitive explanation for what has happened to him. Man your significant other must have a horrendous time debating anything with you. You consistently make up all the rules and all the exceptions to how arguments and debates should go. Must be nice. Everytime someeone refutes a statement you make with statistical evidence you come back with some non-falsifiable statement to continue your argument. I just don't understand why only the Cubs have to deal with two of their star pitchers providing an average season between them for three years in a row. I'd love to just say it's all Dusty's fault, but it just doesn't happen to other teams. If it did, I would accept it. There's definitely some bad luck involved or something. Or on the other hand, no other team has Dusty as a manager?? The very paragraph you wrote is all the evidence you need. Dusty leads the world in pitcher abuse points.
  18. I can't believe I'm going to defend Dusty and the rest of Cubs management but the people on this board and others would have had a heart attack and probably would have burned Wrigley to the ground if the Cubs had shut Prior down in September with the division title within sight. Everyone would have been screaming for their heads. We can't have it both ways. 2003 is in the past and now we're paying the piper. Such is life. I didn't say shut him down, did I? Limit his pitches and innings. This may be beating a dead horse, but how many times have we seen 7,8,9 run leads and starters left in to pitch 125+ pitches. Craziness. Actually not that many. You just remember them more because it rarely happens the Cubs have a big lead and that includes 2003 to the present. Yes, I remember the playoff game where Dusty left Prior in with a huge lead. Still, it hasn't happened that many times. During the stretch run almost every game was a close one and that is where Prior and Wood racked up a lot of innings. I've said it before and I'll say it again, the biggest reason for the Cubs pitchers abuse is the lack of offense and having to leave the starters in so long because the bullpen sucked. Then this year we finally have a bullpen and can't get the game to them with a lead. Two or three games of throwing 30 to 40 extra pitchers (@ 100 pitches) is exponentially worse then an extra start (@ 100 pitches). I don't have the time to dig up the boxes from 2003 but there were plenty of games from late July on that the starter could have been taken out of.
  19. I can't believe I'm going to defend Dusty and the rest of Cubs management but the people on this board and others would have had a heart attack and probably would have burned Wrigley to the ground if the Cubs had shut Prior down in September with the division title within sight. Everyone would have been screaming for their heads. We can't have it both ways. 2003 is in the past and now we're paying the piper. Such is life. Shut Prior down my big toe. How about not have him pitch meaningless innings in blow out games down the stretch? No one would advocate for Prior to have been shut down. But Prior pitched a lot down the stretch late into the game when the game was well in hand. They are damn lucky they even got that far as Z was done about half way through July. It could be the only reason why he is ptiching now. He didn't pile up the innings b/c he wasn't getting anyone out down the stretch. It's always the little things that Dusty doesn't do that hurts this team.
  20. I'll blame Dusty for some things, but I don't know if I can go as far and say he and/or Rothschild hurt Prior. Starting in 2003, when Dusty took over here are Prior's Innings pitched and pitchers per game. 2003: 211 113 2004: 119 98 2005 167 104 Those number aren't that crazy. If Prior can't throw 100 pitchers per game without getting hurt it isn't going to matter who is managing the club. Wood's numbers look like this 2003: 211 110 2004: 140 101 2005: 66 88 My point is I don't think it is ALL Dusty/Rothschild's fault. These two guys seem to be extremely brittle. Wood has more of an injury history than Prior so he is a little easier to figure out. Not sure what the deal is with Prior, sure he threw 200+ innings in 2003, but most elite pitchers will throw 200+ innings in a year. Average number of pitches per start doesn't tell the whole story, I'm afraid. It has a lot to do with how many pitches they're being run out there for in certain starts. Just look at the PAP data. In 2003, Prior made 30 starts. Of those 30, 20 were 110 pitches or more. Of those 20, 9 of them were more than 122 pitches. Wood made 32 starts and also had 20 starts over 110 pitches, 8 of those over 122, and 1 of them over 133. Livan Hernandez, widely regarded as the most abused pitcher in baseball because of his "rubber arm," made 17 CAT3+ starts in 2003 (and finished 3rd in PAP - 1-5 was Vazquez, Wood, Livan, Prior, Redman, with Zambrano sitting at 11th). Average pitch counts can be helpful, but to say Dusty and Rothschild aren't highly responsible for Wood and Prior's troubles is ignoring the truth. How come Vazquez, Livan, and Redman have all pitched a lot since then? They aren't injured. But their managers abused them, how can that be? http://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/images/capblog/2005/03/03/goat.jpg It's nice that you've learned how to insert pictures into your posts, but scapegoating is hardly the right answer here. Wood, Prior, and Z have been some of the most abused pitchers in baseball going back to 2003. So far, they've been lucky with Zambrano.
  21. My thought is that both were/are injured. And it's Dusty's/Larry's fault.
  22. For years Billy Beane has ripped off other teams by trading off his "dominate" closer.
  23. Didn't mean to hurt your feelings. I wasn't in town when that was posted so I didn't see it. I just think that with all the talk of dealing Williamson and other bullpen arms, it's about time people consider trading Dempster. The idea that he'd turn into an elite closer is pretty much shot. He might remain a decent closer for a while though, and he does carry added value because of the label. You didn't hurt my feelings. Your post was much better thought out and written. I was just having a little fun riding on your coat tails.
×
×
  • Create New...