Whoa whoa whoa...this the Cubs board that likes the Garza trade? Nice. Hi, I'm a guy who joined years ago only to post once or twice every few months. That was one of Hendry's best moves in a long time. Landing a 27 year old guy who is a solid #2/top tier #3 from a top tier rotation on a top tier club in a top tier division is a coup for a few prospects most people only started really liking last year. The fact that he could get better is a plus considering he's got the "stuff" to do so, his work ethic is described as intense, and he's shown himself to be a very durable pitcher. I've noticed that many seem to assume Chris Archer will one day become similar to/better than Matt Garza because he's got an electric fastball/breaking ball combo too. Personally, I've seen Chris Archer pitch and followed him since we stole him from the Indians, and he's a reliever. He could/should be a very good reliever. A possible closer even, but I don't see him as a guy who can go 2/3 times around lineups for 200+ innings every year. his command of both pitches are in question. I really hate losing Lee though...guy is going to be their starting SS in a couple years....Chirino meh, Cubs have catchers right now...Fuld..well everyone knows Fuld now...[expletive] guy...good for him. Now all that's left is drafting or buying a true ace. The trade is a big nothing if they don't do that unless Garza becomes significantly better.