I don't know about that. Going into the 03 NLDS, I was nervous as all hell and worried about the Braves, who looked like a powerhouse that year. I didn't feel like we were playing with house money. I thought we had a legitimate shot with our dominant pitching staff that eeked out a playoff spot in a crappy division (sound familiar?) ... In 98 I wasn't treating it that way, either. Granted, I was 15, but I was crushed when they lost, even though that team was crap compared to the Braves. Given the nature of the playoffs, I never felt that nothing to lose mentality and I don't see why other fans would either. I suppose it might be different for a Cubs fan, though, given how (at the time of those appearances) rarely we did make it to the postseason and the drought crap along with it. a lot of people were giving the cubs a good chance to win that series, because of the starting pitching. the braves' top 4 starters had an era+ of 112, 112, 108 and 107 - pretty average. the cubs' top 4 had 178, 139, 135 and 105. power pitchers who are on their game are tough to hit, no matter how good your offense is. i guess that d-bag fans would argue that their top 3 of webb, haren and a healthy randy johnson gives them a formidable front 3, but the cubs would counter with zambrano, harden and dempster, which is way better than the braves' 1-3 of russ ortiz, mike hampton and old greg maddux. Isn't that, by definition, significantly above average? no, it's a little above average. significantly above average is 178, 139, 135.