Well no, but this isn't really a fair assessment. If the Cubs don't improve their roster then no, they won't be as good as the Brewers, because the Brewers have a lot more young talent that is likely to continue to improve in coming years. But you're right, the people on ESPN are wrong to say that the Cubs are far more talented. I think people look at the names on the Cubs - Lee, Ramirez, Soriano, Zambrano - and think that their roster is better. Just because the Brewers' young guys aren't big names doesn't mean they're not good players. Fielder is already better than Lee; Braun is pretty close to being as good as ARam (Braun has been lucky on balls in play though, and his fielding is bad); Corey Hart has been just as productive as Soriano. I like the Cubs' pitching a little better than the Brewers, as I think Hill is better than whoever the Brewers' #2 is, and Lilly is better than the Brewers' #3. Bullpens are pretty close in ability.