Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

I give up. So you're all saying Choi was the obvious choice? Heck, he couldn't hit RHP or LHP most of the year...

 

Look at his numbers, July - September. You're right, he should have been playing.

July - .182/.270/.303/.573

August - .160/.276/.240/.516

September - .000/.167/.000/.167

 

FOR NEARLY ALL OF 2003, KARROS WAS A BETTER CHOICE THAN CHOI TO PLAY EVERY DAY.

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Furcal with a 4 year deal and Neifi signed through 2007 means Cedeno would be blocked until 2008. If we get Furcal it would be foolish not to trade Cedeno now, while his value is high, since 2 years on the bench certainly wouldn't increase his value, and who wants to wait til 2008 to see what he could do as a starter? I don't.

 

Cedeno starts over Perez according to Hendry. You can continue to espouse this belief that he won't if you like, but it gets tiring to see that you state it as fact everytime the topic emerges.

 

The fact is the GM promotes Cedeno as starting and Perez signed as a back-up super-sub for 2B, SS, and even 3B. Perez likely gets a lot of PT of the bench in that super-sub role under Dusty.

 

 

Last year Hendry promoted the idea of DuBois starting in Left. That lasted until Baker got to fill out the Opening Day lineup.

 

Dubois had a respectable shot. In April and May he had 93 at bats (Hollandsworth had 104) and he struck out 33 times with only modest power numbers. It's not like Hollandsworth was any better during those months...neither one of them stepped-up and claimed the job. In June Hollandsworth got hot, and that was it for Dubois.

 

It's true that Dubois didn't start the season as the everyday LF, but then I don't recall that he was handed the job as confidently as with Cedeno.

 

Look, that's water under the bridge. But 93 ABs in the first two months, highly scattered I might add, isn't really a shot. Don't you remeber all those noises Hendry made about someone having to win Rookie of the Year?

 

Even though the Cubs probably won't miss Dubois, all we have left of our decent, not great, prospect is a Jewish Single-A pitcher. And no, he's not a lefty. GO JH!

Posted
I give up. So you're all saying Choi was the obvious choice? Heck, he couldn't hit RHP or LHP most of the year...

 

Look at his numbers, July - September. You're right, he should have been playing.

July - .182/.270/.303/.573

August - .160/.276/.240/.516

September - .000/.167/.000/.167

 

FOR NEARLY ALL OF 2003, KARROS WAS A BETTER CHOICE THAN CHOI TO PLAY EVERY DAY.

 

Those numbers represent 68 at bats over 3 months. That's basically an at-bat per game. Choi was the better option to play against right handers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...