Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

The Cubs nearly took a second-round knockout at the hands of the Mariners Tuesday night. Instead, they forged one of the biggest and fastest comebacks in franchise history, and then quieted everything down and cruised to a delicious win.

If the Cubs had stayed down when the Mariners pounced on them, this would not have been one of those games that falls into the Third 54, the bucket of contests that supposedly separates the good teams from the bad ones. There’s no better example of “you win some, you lose some” than a night on which your exciting rookie starter gets knocked out of the box after recording just four outs, with the team trailing 7-0. Once they roared back to take the lead, though, hanging on for the win was essential. The deflation of giving back a game like that would outweigh the elation of having made the comeback in the first place.

That the team came back at all was deeply impressive, and pretty surprising. In the bottom of the second inning, when they nudged across a lone run to cut the Seattle lead to 7-1, they had an opportunity for much more. Cody Bellinger started that inning with an infield single, and Patrick Wisdom drew a walk. Eric Hosmer then hit into a painfully predictable double play, though, stunting the rally. Thus, when Hosmer came up again with runners on first and second and one out in the third, it was easy to feel bitter and pre-miserable. The score had tightened to 7-3, but another twin killing likely would have torpedoed the Cubs’ chances of coming back.

Hosmer did crack another ground ball to the right side. This one was much more sharply hit, though, and instead of drawing the infielders right to the keystone, it was to the hole between first and second. It snuck through, scoring another run, and the inning got away from the Mariners. As seems to be happening more often this year (with the pitch clock effecting a rhythm that can be very dangerous to pitchers when they get out of phase with it, and with mound visits a more scarce commodity, not to be used up too soon or too lightly), the energy of the frame continued to build.

Obviously, Nelson Velázquez’s grand slam was the play of the game. Velázquez’s demotion to Iowa to open the season was justifiable, given the swing-and-miss he showed in 2022 and the fact that he didn’t acquit himself in center field, but a week and a half into the experiment, it no longer looked that way. Of Trey Mancini, Miles Mastrobuoni, and Patrick Wisdom, only Wisdom showed any semblance of competence in defending right field, and he’s needed at third base. Finally having a right fielder who is familiar with and comfortable in that position, alone, has real value. 

The more important role Velázquez can play, though, is in doing what he did Tuesday night. He worked the count into his favor (something he’ll need to do more consistently in order to be a viable big-leaguer, which made it especially delightful to see), and then he demolished a ball. He has that ability. He, like Christopher Morel, embodies and symbolizes upside, especially in the power department. Mastrobuoni, Nick Madrigal, and Luis Torrens, who got the jobs that might otherwise have gone to Velázquez and Morel to open the season, embody and symbolize safety, at the expense of upside. The Cubs have consistently opted for contact skills and versatility of late. They’re emphasizing run prevention, but they’re also trying to minimize risk.
That’s a lousy way to approach this season, with this team. The median outcome for a roster with this talent level is something like 80 wins, which would please hardly anyone and probably lead to another deconstruction at the trade deadline. What Velázquez’s huge moment should remind us is that the Cubs badly need to embrace some risk and find their 80th- or 90th-percentile outcome, if they want to make any noise in 2023. 

That doesn’t mean that they need to immediately install Velázquez and Morel as everyday players, or push Hosmer aside in favor of Matt Mervis. There’s a balance to be struck, and this 6-4 start is evidence that the team is doing a decent job of striking it. They won a very losable game Tuesday night because they had some good luck, some impressive depth, and the dynamism to put a lot of runs on the board quickly, but they also needed good pitching and defense to seal it. They can stay the course, in some measure. They just need to stay open to trying things, the same way they stayed relentlessly aggressive in adding to their lead in this (eventually) comfortable win.

Third Bucket Record: 2-2


View full article

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think the fact that they have so obviously prioritized run prevention in the infield makes it even more baffling that they broke camp with only 2 actual outfielders on the roster.  

Also, bizarre that this may not even be the craziest comeback over the Seattle Mariners at home when they were trailing 6-0 when the Cubs came to bat in the 3rd inning at Wrigley Field

Posted

There was too much happening last night for me to catch this game. The Twins were in a tight match all night, the Wolves were playing the Lakers, and this game got out of hand in a hurry so I tuned out. I'm sorry I missed this comeback, it sounds amazing.

Posted

How long do Mervis and Morel need to OPS 1.000 at Iowa before the Cubs’ prudence becomes intransigence?

The Cubs have never made a habit of letting their prospects wallow in the minors. If Morel and Mervis keep clubbing the ball, I expect them up sooner than later. 

I’m rooting hard for Velazquez to make it impossible for them to send him back down when Suzuki is ready to come back. 

Posted
1 minute ago, champaignchris said:

How long do Mervis and Morel need to OPS 1.000 at Iowa before the Cubs’ prudence becomes intransigence?

The Cubs have never made a habit of letting their prospects wallow in the minors. If Morel and Mervis keep clubbing the ball, I expect them up sooner than later. 

I’m rooting hard for Velazquez to make it impossible for them to send him back down when Suzuki is ready to come back. 

The big factors are the existing roster's performance, and fit/balance on the roster.  Mervis is probably not going to come up while Hosmer has a near .400 OBP and 114 wRC+ unless Mancini is hurt or completely craters(which they're going to give much more than 2 weeks to decide given his 2 year deal).  The question is how quick the trigger is if and when Hosmer stops producing.

 

Morel is more about balance.  He bears a fair amount in common with Wisdom(who is hitting well) and Velazquez as a hitter in terms of strengths/weaknesses, so while he's probably going to outproduce Madrigal or Mastrobuoni in a vacuum, the opportunities he would have for playing time would set him up for failure and/or imbalance the lineup against the types that all of Wisdom/Morel/Velazquez (not to mention Rios and Bellinger) struggle with in particular.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...