Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 944
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest
Guests
Posted

If he graded out well at tackle then why play him at guard?

 

You know who PFF hates? Charles Leno jr.

Community Moderator
Posted
Why hasn't Billings been taken yet?

No idea.

 

Know nothing about this picky either. Hopefully he can play special teams because short of injuries that's the only way he'll contribute in the next 2 years. They obviously liked him a lot.

 

Definitely behind Freeman, Trevathan, Jones and Acho on the depth chart. Would have liked to see something at RB or TE there. Adams was just sitting there and he's ranked as the #2 TE on the board. Even a DB might have made more sense.

Posted (edited)
If he graded out well at tackle then why play him at guard?

 

You know who PFF hates? Charles Leno jr.

 

i think we value high end interior line play more highly as long as we can be adequate on the edges. lots of shotgun and lots of quick throws nowadays.

Edited by David
Guest
Guests
Posted
If he graded out well at tackle then why play him at guard?

 

You know who PFF hates? Charles Leno jr.

Not very long for the outside at the pro level.

 

Does PFF hate Leno? I thought he graded out how he looks, average.

 

Youre right, though his bad games were at the beginning of the season.

Posted (edited)
Why hasn't Billings been taken yet?

No idea.

 

Know nothing about this picky either. Hopefully he can play special teams because short of injuries that's the only way he'll contribute in the next 2 years. They obviously liked him a lot.

 

Definitely behind Freeman, Trevathan, Jones and Acho on the depth chart. Would have liked to see something at RB or TE there. Adams was just sitting there and he's ranked as the #2 TE on the board. Even a DB might have made more sense.

 

Yea I like Adams too (not sure he's the number 2 TE overall), but this is the point of the draft I'm also going to basically trust them on BPA as long as its not a kicker, punter, or longsnapper. Also three more opportunities in the next like 35 picks to go need based, if there is a need you really want to fill.

Edited by WrigleyField 22
Guest
Guests
Posted
If he graded out well at tackle then why play him at guard?

 

You know who PFF hates? Charles Leno jr.

 

i think we value high end interior line play more highly as long as we can be adequate on the edges. lots of shotgun and lots of quick throws nowadays.

 

I thought that was Trestman's philosophy.

Community Moderator
Posted

No idea.

 

Know nothing about this picky either. Hopefully he can play special teams because short of injuries that's the only way he'll contribute in the next 2 years. They obviously liked him a lot.

 

Definitely behind Freeman, Trevathan, Jones and Acho on the depth chart. Would have liked to see something at RB or TE there. Adams was just sitting there and he's ranked as the #2 TE on the board. Even a DB might have made more sense.

 

Yea I like Adams too but this is the point of the draft I'm also going to basically trust them on BPA as long as us not a kicker, punter, or longsnapper.

 

Kwiatkowski seems to be a good value pick since he was ranked #85 on PFF.

Posted

i'm a sucker for defensive line play so i really want more more more

 

i get wanting to pick up dudes at TE/CB/RB though

Posted
If he graded out well at tackle then why play him at guard?

 

You know who PFF hates? Charles Leno jr.

 

i think we value high end interior line play more highly as long as we can be adequate on the edges. lots of shotgun and lots of quick throws nowadays.

 

I thought that was Trestman's philosophy.

It's typical of zone blocking teams, which we aren't really, though we're not a power scheme totally either.

Posted
If he graded out well at tackle then why play him at guard?

 

You know who PFF hates? Charles Leno jr.

 

i think we value high end interior line play more highly as long as we can be adequate on the edges. lots of shotgun and lots of quick throws nowadays.

 

I thought that was Trestman's philosophy.

 

it's not only trestman's philosophy...and i think the saints are pretty known for it too

Posted

 

i think we value high end interior line play more highly as long as we can be adequate on the edges. lots of shotgun and lots of quick throws nowadays.

 

I thought that was Trestman's philosophy.

It's typical of zone blocking teams, which we aren't really, though we're not a power scheme totally either.

 

aren't we trying to go that way? i'll admit my knowledge of x's and o's is extremely rudimentary

Posted
i'm a sucker for defensive line play so i really want more more more

 

i get wanting to pick up dudes at TE/CB/RB though

If we pick a CB or RB they basically have to play ST or there isn't a roster spot for them. It's definitely a factor at this point, particularly for RB.

 

I still want a S too, but maybe they think Rolle will bounce back.

Posted

 

I thought that was Trestman's philosophy.

It's typical of zone blocking teams, which we aren't really, though we're not a power scheme totally either.

 

aren't we trying to go that way? i'll admit my knowledge of x's and o's is extremely rudimentary

I mean our personnel all basically fit it, so I guess but I think we're still not true zone. Our OL coach has never been a zone guy.

Posted
i'm a sucker for defensive line play so i really want more more more

 

i get wanting to pick up dudes at TE/CB/RB though

If we pick a CB or RB they basically have to play ST or there isn't a roster spot for them. It's definitely a factor at this point, particularly for RB.

 

I still want a S too, but maybe they think Rolle will bounce back.

 

d'oh...when i typed CB, i was thinking secondary, but yeah, it'd be nice if they could pull another amos out of their asses

Posted
i'm a sucker for defensive line play so i really want more more more

 

i get wanting to pick up dudes at TE/CB/RB though

If we pick a CB or RB they basically have to play ST or there isn't a roster spot for them. It's definitely a factor at this point, particularly for RB.

 

I still want a S too, but maybe they think Rolle will bounce back.

 

d'oh...when i typed CB, i was thinking secondary, but yeah, it'd be nice if they could pull another amos out of their asses

I'd settle for a Conte, lol, but yea.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...