Playoffs Week 2

[sneakypower]

Jesus Christ, calvinball's made 18 transactions in the last week alone

 

i don't really have the energy to try to counter that type of spaz streaming; congrats in advance for your likely win, i guess

[abuck1220]

probably need a weekly transactions limit next year.

[sneakypower]

don't you worry Nelson would quit the league if he's forced to construct a half-way decent team

[Tracer Bullet]

So last year the complaint was that I made too many trades so we had to endure this thread whining about them and a discussion about changing the rules to prevent trading. Now you're complaining that I make changes in a daily league and you want to change the rules to prevent that.

 

Now I get to sit and read why this is all my fault.

[Tracer Bullet]

oh [expletive]. hahaha. you bitch about me but you forgot to add that you made 5 TRANSACTIONS TODAY - THE FIST DAY OF THIS MATCHUP. lol

 

"look at that guy over there making all those changes. What a jerk he is. I don't have time for this."

[sneakypower]

to do otherwise would put me at a clear disadvantage, is the obvious realization any halfway intelligent person would have reached

 

i was just bemoaning you didn't construct a good enough team of its own accord (143 transactions to date) so the other teams (none have reached 100) are left at a disadvantage if they don't show the same fanatical devotion

 

that's all, i'm not saying the rules disallow it; i'd just prefer that level of weird obsession wasn't necessary to be at an even playing field

 

who knows, maybe my otherwise vastly superior team will still overcome your all hands on deck approach

[Tracer Bullet]

PROPOSED RULE CHANGE:

 

chess rules- if you concede a matchup you automatically lose the matchup, i don't think i can handle another season of you whiny [expletive] falling over each other to be the first to declare your hopes dead on a weekly basis

[sneakypower]

hey, have at it, winning on a technicality is always your obvious dream result

[Tracer Bullet]

to do otherwise would put me at a clear disadvantage, is the obvious realization any halfway intelligent person would have reached

 

i was just bemoaning you didn't construct a good enough team of its own accord (143 transactions to date) so the other teams (none have reached 100) are left at a disadvantage if they don't show the same fanatical devotion

 

that's all, i'm not saying the rules disallow it; i'd just prefer that level of weird obsession wasn't necessary to be at an even playing field

 

who knows, maybe my otherwise vastly superior team will still overcome your all hands on deck approach

 

your logic is truly dizzying.

 

You've got a vastly superior team but to not change it would put you at a disadvantage (of course, you picked up a guy I dropped from my apparently terrible team and then dropped him already today).

 

I have a "fanatical devotion" because I make a bunch of changes, which take like, seconds. You count the number of transactions that every team has made this season...you're [expletive] psycho

[sneakypower]

um, they have computers and things these days that do that stuff for you

[Tracer Bullet]

No one's saying you counted each individual transaction, doofus. taking the time to figure out the number of moves I've made (and then getting the number wrong) seems like a weird waste of time, especially when you're bitching about not having enough time.

[sneakypower]

probably took a minute or two

 

do you want to know how?

[Tracer Bullet]

Time you could have been spending making another 5 transaction today

[sneakypower]

so you agree you're killing my vibe