Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
This article says he was a heavy signability pick at No. 6 overall and outlines the deal where he ended up not signing with Arizona:

 

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=jp-louxdiamondbacks080310

 

Here's his Lone Star Ball scouting report from February:

http://www.lonestarball.com/2012/2/9/2786354/barret-loux-scouting-report

 

He threw ~130 innings this year before going on the DL with "fatigue." Peripherals were not above-average across the board but nothing eyepopping. His ceiling is considered pretty ordinary. But as always in our system, AA or AAA starting pitchers who are actually prospects are a nice plus.

It's nice to see that he's stayed relatively healthy the last two seasons given what happened with the D-Backs. But, as a 23 year old in AA, his numbers dropped off noticeably from the year before. In High-A, he had the numbers I always look for. Less hits than innings pitched, better than 3-to-1 K/BB ratio and more than a K per inning. Only the Ks declined precipitously last year in a notoriously strong hitter's league.

 

I hope this isn't true, but perhaps Brigham was one of many hard throwing relief prospects and the FO felt they needed starters more even if Loux is less talented. One thing Loux is better at is throwing strikes and that fits the FO's profile.

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Sounds like a situation where the rangers gave us a pool of players to pick during the original trade and said if one got hurt we could swap him out with the other in the offseason.
Posted
This article says he was a heavy signability pick at No. 6 overall and outlines the deal where he ended up not signing with Arizona:

 

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=jp-louxdiamondbacks080310

 

Here's his Lone Star Ball scouting report from February:

http://www.lonestarball.com/2012/2/9/2786354/barret-loux-scouting-report

 

He threw ~130 innings this year before going on the DL with "fatigue." Peripherals were not above-average across the board but nothing eyepopping. His ceiling is considered pretty ordinary. But as always in our system, AA or AAA starting pitchers who are actually prospects are a nice plus.

 

He was rated in the 30s by BA going into the draft. Definitely a signability pick but still a good prospect back in the day. Injury has taken a bit off his stuff and the injury risk is obviously elevated with him, but he's still got 3/4 starter potential. I'd take that for Brigham.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...