Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

 

Sort of both. My point was that Theriot may have been 2 for 13 or whatever, but some of his at-bats, if I remember correctly, were nice battles. But whatever - I think his 150-something at bats were a much better indicator of what he can do than those 13 the year before.

 

I have been impressed with Theriot, but that's just me.

 

There is an inherent danger involved in drawing statistical inferences from limited sample sizes. Case in point...... Cedeno's performace in 2005. I'd imagine you were equally impressed by that limited sample size, too, eh?

 

.300/.356/.375 in 89 PA

 

.328/.412/.522 in 159 PA

 

I sincerely hope nobody was equally impressed by those two lines.

 

With a better manager Cedeno would've had at least 250 PA in 2005 and we would have gone into 2006 with a much better picture of Cedeno's ability level. Instead we got to watch Neifi save the day.

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...