It seems you measure Hendry's value differently some others. I don't look at this season and blame Hendry. He assembled a team that should have made the playoffs. Number of wins is a reflection on the manager more than the general manager. I measure Hendry's worth in value of deals. Or maybe you are the one who measures it differently. Wins and losses are the only things that matter. How can you possibly measure the value of a deal, if collectively, all those deals fail to produce more wins? I don't see how a manager can be held accountable for the record, but not the GM. Managers don't win games. They can lose some, and Dusty has lost a few on his own with his silliness. Players win the games, and the GM assembles the players. With a top 5 payroll the past 3 years, Hendry simply has not assembled a good enough team. There is no justification for this team not averaging more than 90 wins per year the past three years. Some say 2003 was overachieving, but there was nothing overly impressive or surprising about 88 wins. It was only the failures of the rivals that allowed 88 wins to be meaningful. 88 was nothing to get giddy over. It was an acceptable progression. But last year's team should have been 92-95 wins easily. Dusty hurt the team's chances, but the team still came up short. And this year there was no justification for the giant step back. This entire organization's focus has been in the wrong spot. Hendry has to take blame, Dusty gets blamed, but he deflects it like he typically does. Hendry has actually stepped up and accepted blame, fans shouldn't feel sorry for him and stop assigning blame to him just because he's the one with the guts to accept it. I agree with you 100%.