Probably zero. The Cubs were winning games between Kendall and Barrett. Hill had a winning record as a catcher, by a nice margin. I'm not saying Hill gets the credit, I'm saying the team was winning regardless, so I don't see any real opportunity cost. I suppose the team wins-more in the same game, which doesn't matter at all. The entire Soto craze is way overblown. It's like a bride anticipating a dream wedding that will never happen the way its projected. Explain to me why its overblown? The guy has put up unbelievable numbers this year, at a position that has sucked for 3/4's the season for the Cubs, and you think its overblown that people want Soto to get a chance? Kendalls D is downright pathetic, and last night was prime example. He was a big cause to the implosion from Marshall. He has a 554 OPS in Sept, and if somebody reaches 1st base with decent speed against us, its an automatic double, as Kendall stands no chance at throwing out a runner. So once again, please explain to me, how its overblown, because there are plenty of reasons for Soto over Kendall, where as Kendalls 1 thing he has over Soto is meaningless(experience).