It shouldent even be a damn question Jesus. The only thing Soto has over Kendall is experience, which shouldnt mean a damn thing considering 3 of our 4 starters are extremely experienced. Hill is the only non experienced guy in our rotation, so there you go Lou, let Kendall catch Hill, let Soto catch everybody else, question solved. Right or wrong, it is a question. Baseball managers at any level have a natural inclination to avoid sticking rookies in a critical role down the stretch, especially rookies just brought up to the big leagues. Hell, managers at any level of any industry have that bias. Experience buys you a longer leash and a first nod in most managers' minds. Few baseball managers will take a gamble on September call-ups in a critical role. The ones that do, usually do it with pitchers, not positional guys. Soto has done exactly what he needed to do in September - make himself memorable to the big league team. I'm not saying Lou is right by sticking with Kendall as the 1st option. I'm saying his actions are pretty standard and traditional for an older baseball mind. But his recent quote is also in line with Lou's habits - he likes to ride the hot hand while it's hot. Even if he doesn't get a lot of time in the last 12 games, he'll get a long look next year in ST. Like I said why do you need an experienced catcher when 3/4's of your rotation is experienced?