Go. Soriano/DeJesus/Scheirholtz (Sappelt, Hairston) Stewart/Castro/Barney/Rizzo (Valbuena, Matherbridge) Castillo (Navarro) Samardzija/Jackson/Garza/Feldman/Wood Marmol/Fujikawa/Russell/Villanueva/Camp/Wade/Rondon Wood over Villanueva in the rotation. Rondon beats out Dolis for the last spot with his Rule V status basically being the tiebreaker. Wade makes the team as an NRI. I think Baker can start the season on the 60-day DL backdated by like 45 days and not miss too much time.
I'm ignoring them because they are an ancillary point. The point is that Lillibridge's apparent ascension to the roster is a bad decision. The Perez/Macias comparison was a minor aside. If you have valid reason for disliking them but not Lillibridge, then you aren't being inconsistent, but you're still wrong for not disliking Lillibridge.
Don't mistake not finding your distinction relevant for not understanding it. I expect the Cubs to try to win baseball games this season, perhaps even with the playoffs as an end results, and I don't think they should be making decisions that hurt that goal without clear gains.
If everyone would stop disagreeing when I'm right, we could have settled this early. I know it's pointless to generalize about groups of people that do not have homogenous opinions, but I find it a little bewildering that the section of Cubs fandom that used to destroy guys like Neifi Perez or Jose Macias suddenly don't care when the team puts really bad players on the roster, or at least appears to intend to.
Well, enjoy the spring training pics, because there's literally nothing else for you here Cubs-wise. That philosophy is so generic it can be used to justify every move ever made by any front office. "Well, they think there's something there."
I'm pretty sure he's making the team. But what if he's absolute garbage in ST? Then surely Kyle would want him not making....ooooohhhhh, riiiiiiiiiight, he hates that, too. He shouldn't be making the team no matter what he does in spring training. But if we somehow luck into the right decision through a bad process, I'll call it a draw.
Shame on them for giving him a job at all, based on spring training results. Make a bad decision for a bad reason and get a bad result, you get the blame, even if that bad result is toward the worse end of variance.
Nix is pretty much the only one you could make that argument about unless you want to continue hiding behind selective generalizations and pretending things like Old Man Cairo who was terrible last year is a preferable option. Nope. Everyone one of them has been consistently better than Matherbridge.
I kind of want the front office that's proven it's capable of taking care of the little things to actually take care of the little things, because their failure to do so sort of implies that they just don't care.
So long as we never use our backup infielder at the two positions he's played most in his career, he's almost replacement level. I'm sorry I doubted you, Theo and Jed.