I'd rather have Mathis catching than Barrett. I'm not thrilled with Pierre either, but who else could they get to lead off? Izturis should probably hit 7 or 8, but he was hitting pretty well before he got hurt, and he's only 26. Not to mention his glove. Those moves would leave money to improve the bench. I don't see how the offense could be worse than this year. Yeah, the rotation is weak after Zambrano and Zito...and you'd have a whole lot of money tied up in 5 players (the Lee's, Zito, Zambrano, and ARod). I can't see any reason to prefer Mathis to Barrett. And to trade Barrett and maybe more to get Mathis would be just lunacy. It really should be the other way around. If the Angels want Barrett, it should cost Mathis and McPherson or something like that. Mathis isn't even the top young catcher in Anaheim any more. How would the offense be worse? Pierre is Pierre. There's no upgrade there unless Pierre has a better year than he's having this year. Izturis isn't likely to produce much or any better than what we have had in the two hole this year. Walker is a more productive hitter. Izturis is a career 261 hitter and his OBP isn't much over 300. So, the top two spots in your line-up are not going to be any better than what we have this year. The middle of your order is intriguing however. Lee is Lee so that's a wash with this year's line-up. Arod is better than Ramirez and C. Lee is better than what we have in the fifth spot, so you have improved the heart of the order. Murton is Murton, so unless Murton improves there isn't improvement there. Same with Cedeno. Barrett is so much better than Mathis that this bottom third takes a major hit. The only way your line-up is any improvement over this year's is if the middle three can provide enough improvement to over-take the losses you'll have in both the upper third and lower third. While it probably will be better, the improvement is only marginal.