As someone who lived it and remembers it vividly there are a few parallels. However, if memory serves the Cubs were up about 9-1/2 games in the middle of August after the Kenny Holtzman no-hitter. That just illustrates the time frame reference of the magnitude of the Cubs collapse. The Mets had much better starting pitching than the Brewers do. A young Tom Seaver, Jerry Koosman, Nolan Ryan, and Gary Gentry if memory serves. This would be akin to the Brewers having three or four healthy Ben sheets type starters. One thing Lou is doing which Leo Durocher did not do was to give his starters periodic rest as witnessed by Ramirez and Floyd getting days off. However, in Leo's defense, his bench was not nearly as strong as Piniella's.The top five EVERYDAY in the lineup was Kessinger, Beckert, Williams, Santo and Banks. Also, Randy Hundley was going to catch about 156 games on average. The Brewers have a much better starting line-up than the Mets did and probably a superior bullpen. However, their starting pitching can't come close to the Mets of 69 nor the magnitude of their losing their lead. Sorry to bring up such painful memories of 1969 for those of us who went through it. I've always believed that because of that season, the mind-set of Cub fans was set. That being, things are going well now, how will it collapse soon? Unfortunately, that was reaffirmed in the 1984 play-offs against the Padres.