Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Magnetic Curses

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    29,978
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Magnetic Curses

  1. i'm convinced we're picking a bunch of guys i've never heard of
  2. oh come on, it was just a harmless zing, accept it with dignity
  3. he already zinged you, it's too late to save face
  4. why you left is beyond me
  5. The biggest need is a good LT. We've got what? Potentially 4 Guards on the roster already? Spencer, Edwin/Chris Williams, Garza and one more I think but his name is escaping me. lance louis
  6. because he's considering trading colt mccoy?
  7. They also coach for Clemson. OK? They recruited both players and they played against them every season. And they HATE South Carolina with a passion. Your point is what? i think he thought that ingram played at clemson
  8. A box-and-one? http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRscAS-g42eAaX3CJ6cWMcwOd7NxARyoS5WOd1cNExE138Rukf_1A
  9. new england plays a 3-4
  10. meltodowns, ha. i'm not preaching doom. this is still a good team, regardless of the incompetence of the pick.
  11. which isn't what emery drafted him for
  12. he has the athleticism, he's a great pass-blocker. the only question on him are his short arms, which are longer than joe thomas's
  13. How much have you seen McClellin play? It doesn't matter. Sulley's not trying for rational arguments at this point folks. He's looking for exactly what you're giving him. you're taking this pretty personally, aintcha
  14. How much have you seen McClellin play? i've never seen an orangutan play checkers but i know that they aren't suited for it. even if all you know is highlight film, the absence of a bull-rush sack or tfl from a film demonstrating his good plays is pretty glaring if you're hoping he's going to be one of your front 4 players. he's not a 4-3 end, the only other teams interested in him were the pats and packers. guess what they play, go ahead, guess.
  15. I never said that. yes, you never said we had a lottery ticket, you said we had a piece of paper with numbers on it that may or may not win us money based on a chance drawing. but i agree, you never used the term lottery ticket.
  16. so we have a lottery ticket, what insight.
  17. heavy implication followed by "i never said that." sounds like a republican. but if you'll notice, i didn't single him out.
  18. in chicago, the "pros" have generally gotten these picks wrong, this year looks to be no different. i don't see why you all are so married to the idea that "pros" don't make terrible mistakes. Oh geez, I make one comment and I'm married to it? I'm just not married to the idea that this is definitely a horrible, awful pick, and that you or jersey know that right off the bat when these the Bears think it was the right one. Maybe it turns out bad....all draft picks are gambles and the Bears have certainly made their share of bad picks. But I'm just trying to defend the guy from some of the absolute venom that's coming from some of you guys on this pick. i don't know, you guys are the ones talking about how the pros are so smart and have so much information that they can't possibly fail.
  19. I like what the offensive players are capable of doing. There's a lot of risk there, though, with Britt and Cook. well, i really like my team so we're even
  20. yeah, you aren't a homer
  21. you really like your team, huh?
  22. perry, mercilus, and even jones all have the ability to bull rush. this kid avoids contact on the rush and tries to outguess the tackles. he's got good instincts, but he's not a physical player. if you can't play physical, you're going to lose contain a lot in the NFL. this guy is a gimmick player, a situational pass-rusher. if he's got good coverage skills, they can play him at linebacker on downs 1-2 and then put his hand on the ground on 3rd, but that doesn't sound like something lovie does.
  23. in chicago, the "pros" have generally gotten these picks wrong, this year looks to be no different. i don't see why you all are so married to the idea that "pros" don't make terrible mistakes.
  24. Yeah, those are 3 very big red flags to me for any player. I've said before I like McClellin, but not nearly this high. he's a 3-4 linebacker
×
×
  • Create New...