Or maybe he is just being accurate. I hate to introduce empirical evidence in a thread like this one, but, in two and a half pages of posts, shouldn't someone have asked what Murton thinks? I couldn't agree with you more. I want him gone, too. But I can't bring myself to make the leap to using words like idiot when describing Dusty Baker. Not only do I think it is needlessly disrespectful, its simply inaccurate. Comments like "he's an idiot" say more about the person that wrote them than they do about the subject, in my opinion. Wait, you're expecting Murton to say something else there? How can he make any answer besides one that flagellates his manager without fear of repercussion? And it took all of 5 minutes to get the standard response. Why is it that whenever a player says something good about Dusty Baker that some fans immediately write it off as that he was somehow forced to say it? Does anyone have any evidence that suggests Baker runs his clubhouse with an iron fist, and that if anyone says anything less than the highest possible praise about Dusty that they'll sit the rest of the year? Come on, sethuel1, Murton could have said 100 different things. He could have ended the session and said, "I've got to go". He could have said, "It may have made a difference. Who knows? I just came to play." He could've said, "Well, Dusty's the manager. He makes the decisions on who plays and who doesn't. That's not my job." Any of those would have been fine. But he didn't say them, did he? Because it's really standard to end interviews while leaving the last question hanging.