Here's my issue with this. Ok lets say he HAS to be better. You do realize what that means right? That means he's playing at the same level as Brady/Manning/Rivers/Rodgers. To be better basically means he got a 100 QB rating consistently. He's just not going to be that. Sure if it all came together for his career year in an ideal world, he can do it. He got the talent for it, but he lacks the mental part to do it consistently. Compared to his career, he HAS been better this year. It's maybe not as much as what most of you guys thought it should be, but I think the expectations were just too high for a QB like Cutler. I really don't care how much $$ he makes because A) it's not long term B) Bears had the cap space for it and it's not stopping them from signing other players C) we had no other option in FA and McCown wasn't going to be one regardless of how good he was last year and D) do you really want to start a rookie QB I've been trying to think of how I would compare Cutler and his game in other ways, but the only thing I can think of is me at golf. I'm a 6 handicap. Now I'm pretty inconsistent for someone to shoot that well. I can shoot anywhere from 72 to 85 on any given day. I'm like Cutler in a sense where I can hit a long way (he got a cannon), but my short game/putter is very iffy/meh/below average (mental game/play recognition) and I'll risk for a penalty or a bad score if I think I got a good chance at making an eagle for example (gunslinger). Sometimes it works, but more often I should have played it safe. I once shot a 41 on 9 holes with a 10. The 41 really isn't a bad score. It's good, but I could've turned in a GREAT score and the 10 is mind boggling because you're wondering where that come from. Then there are days when everything comes together and I shoot a 68-71 (68 is my best score so far). It's probably why I'm still of a fan of his because I feel like I can relate to Cutler somewhat and still think he can win/take us to the playoffs. That and I don't want to go back to the Grossman/Orton/Miller/McNown/Stewart/Chandler days. Basically what I'm trying to say is that Cutler really has played well this year so far, it's just those 4-5 passes/plays per game (out of 45 or so) are so cringe-worthy that everyone want to REALLY focus on that and just kinda ignore the other 40 plays that he was actually pretty good. Like your example of "you'd think the Bears would be 5-2 (which you could argue they would be if not for terrible Cutler turnovers in the Bills and Panthers games)". Yes, Cutler had terrible turnovers in those games, but Panthers scored 31 points and Cutler scored 3 TDs in that game. Not sure what else he could honestly do and lets not forget about Forte's fumble here. EJ Manuel look like Aaron Rodgers plus the D couldn't stop the run if they wanted to in the Bills game. The defense is NOT middle of the pack IMO. They're giving up 24 points a game and 29.8 in losses. Given up 38/31/13/27 the past 4 weeks and they're 1-3. You should expect that record. We could have won the Bills/Panthers/Dolphins maybe, but they still gave up 23/31/27 in those games. They let Manuel/Tannehill/etc looks like All-Pro against us. Defense also give up a score on 42.7% of their drives which is the exact same % as last year. Defense just aren't stopping anyone for the most part. Sure they're in the middle of the pack if you look at yards allowed, but they give up scores too often/easily. Sure Cutler's turnovers play a good part of it, but the D is still not doing their part. Have they improved though? Sure, but it's minimal at the moment. EDIT: Sorry for the long post.