the next 5 years? it's asking a lot for a center to be good until he's 36. not to mention it's not even guaranteed he signs here. obviously the trade was made for beyond this year, but they obviously were expecting much different results THIS year, and it's troubling just HOW bad they look. the downside is that the zach/vuc combo could not work at all, and we end up giving away 2 firsts for nothing, while also not getting any top picks. His game should easily translate for the next 5 years, but I was more meaning putting together a competitive team to surround Zach though his prime (hopefully with someone eventually better than Zach). Yes, they will be competitive next year. The downside you speak of can easily be recuperated by trading Zach and/or Vuc if this really isn’t coming together a year from now. We also were very unlikely to get a top pick even before the trade, unless you consider the 10th overall pick a top pick. Just curious, what would you have done instead? i still would have done it, but the early returns are pretty miserable. i know it's for the future, but it was supposed to lead them solidifying their spot this year. we need to establish that this is a good competitive team before any star would consider coming here, and it looks like the turnaround won't start until next season now. it's just frustrating because even though this is an extremely flawed roster, there is still plenty of talent to be making a push in the weak east.