What difference does it make whether or not we get pitching back? Yea it hurt to lose Nolaso and Pinto, but Marshall, Marmol, Hill, Guzman, Gallagher, Ryu, Wells, are more than enough to fill the void. If you can get a good position prospect for Pierre it would essentially be like you traded a strength (pitching) for a weakness (position players). I'm in favor of trading him. While he could be a decent stop gap for Pie next year, there are likely to be some other decent CF you could pick up in FA over the offseason. With the way Pierre has played of late, he may have risen his value enough to get a decent return back. It wont make up for what we gave up, but a good GM will admit a mistake and cut his losses. I agree we would need to be blown away with an offer for Dempster, Howry, and Eyre, but you never know, a team looking for a closer might do just that. And I would go back to the same thing with Pierre, who cares if its pitching or not? Just aquire assets. As an example you could look at John Paxson for the Bulls who picked up a strong SF in a draft day trade even though its the strongest position, but its a strong asset that he can use to consolidate when one specific need comes up. Right now the Cubs have more than one need so theres no sense in trying to only accept help a one area.