Jump to content
North Side Baseball

WrigleyField 22

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    19,067
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by WrigleyField 22

  1. I have zero issue with the draft overall. My issue was how much they sat out FA. Even an extra starting caliber OL and WR would have made a nice boost to O. Hopefully all those OL pay dividends down the line but this year, it still feels like a little bit of a wish and a prayer. But if Thomas or Jones is awesome day 1, Poles looks like a genius. About that extra WR still. Unless they're playing lots of 12 personnel (which I guess could help protect a young OL), there's some vets they could go sign to raise floor of group.
  2. Yea probably just sees that was the first O pick and called it the best lol
  3. Jean Delance is another combine invite guy they signed OL Jean Delance, Florida NFL Combine rating = 5.90 https://www.nfl.com/prospects/jean-delance/32004445-4c07-3640-9622-ed04594313c9 https://thedraftnetwork.com/sr-prospect/jean-delance-a25c32fe-2b5a-4acc-b18c-60fcc79c2829/ So far 22 total signings and 14 tryouts. With that number of signings I think they actually need to make some corresponding moves, or some tryouts are being mis-reported as signings.
  4. horsefeathers ton (20+) of UDFAs already reported, but only 2 who were combine invites. LB Jack Sanborn, Wisconsin NFL Combine rating = 5.63 PFF Big Board= 200 https://www.nfl.com/prospects/jack-sanborn/32005341-4e04-7762-4775-97edb77192d7 https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/jack-sanborn/82566/draft-profile TE Chase Allen, Iowa State NFL Combine rating = 5.96 PFF Big Board = 296 https://www.nfl.com/prospects/chase-allen/3200414c-4c08-1182-aecf-faa5e2918941 https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/chase-allen/39988/draft-profile
  5. Poles seems to value 40 time over the agility drills like cone/shuttle. But he also got skill guys who are pretty dense. Just kind of interesting. Overall a class big on athletic traits though.
  6. Landry, Fuller, and Hurns are 3 WR they could sign at varying levels of $/risk/upside.
  7. A lot of special teamers. Should have a couple starting DBs and the a whole lot of role players and backups and projects. One of the OL probably gets cut but most of these guys can probably make this roster. Honestly I don't know if any of those OL get cut unless they are just really bad. Even if they wanna go sign another vet. Borom-Whitehair-Lucas-Jenkins top 4 Thomas-Carter-Kramer for one starting spot and two backups. Jones development piece who doesn't dress One more backup spot for Dozier, Davenport, etc.
  8. Poles is a traits guy. All these guys have big athletic traits.
  9. Volume on day 3 might as well. They were way behind on filling out both 53 man and 90 man rosters. Braxton is a big project, but huge potential. Poles first small school flyer.
  10. No brainer move based on how many roster spots Bears have open. And I suspect this was even the original agreed upon deal, but they had to wait for the comp picks to be formally awarded.
  11. Yep, some definite self preservation going on it feels like. Should they be treating Fields any other way? He might be “our guy” as fans, but he’s definitely not Poles’ guy. Um, for self preservation, no. It's an ugly reality, but about 90% of fans and owners seem to tie a GMs fate to a single roll of the dice at a QB. So Poles is gonna keep his roll in his back pocket. But if I was a owner I'd make sure my GM felt confident that he could just try to build around a QB and not worry if they fail.
  12. Yep, some definite self preservation going on it feels like.
  13. Extremely hard to predict with a gap of 41 picks, but gonna throw out some names Tier 1. Guys who could continue to drop, but not likely Max Mitchell, OT/G, Louisiana Darian Kinnard, OT/G, Kentucky Zach Tom, OL, Wake Forest Perrion Winfrey, DT, Oklahoma Dameron Pierce, RB, Florida Kyle Phillips, WR, UCLA Romeo Doubs, WR, Nevada Tier 2. More realistic options Kellen Dieach, OT/G, Arizona St Matthew Butler, DT, Tennessee Bo Melton, WR, Rutgers Zamir White, RB, Georgia Pierre Strong Jr, RB, South Dakota State (one of my big draft crushes) Lecitus Smith, OG, VA Tech Brandon Smith, LB, Penn State Chicoziem Okonwo, TE, Maryland Tycen Anderson, S, Toledo Other flyers to keep an eye on for later/UDFA Curtis Brooks, DT, Cincinnati Jason Poe, G, Mercer Kalia David, DT, UCF Chris Paul, OT/G, Tulsa Cade May's, OL, Tennessee Alec Lindstrom, C, Boston Damarri Mathis, CB, Pitt Tariq Castro-Fields, CB, Penn St Jayden Peevy, DT, Texas A&M Jaivon Heiligh, WR, Coastal Carolina Cordell Volson, OT, North Dakota State Dontario Drummond, WR, Mississippi Dai'Jean Dixon, WR, Nicholls State Decobie Durant, CB, South Carolina St Jeremiah Hall, FB/TE, Oklahoma Braxton Jones OT, Southern Utah Dare Rosenthal, OT, Kentucky Austin Decelus, OT, LSU
  14. Bears Twitter turning on him is a reassuring sign to me. Great leading indicator.
  15. Exactly. Draft defense (or really BPA), pick up a couple offensive FAs, see where you’re at next year when you have more space and better draft capital. Oh they absolutely should have done more in FA, but... Poles has other plans. Wait and see.
  16. On one hand I get it, but on the other hand, counting on the draft to support Fields wouldn't have been smart. Welcome to 3-4 weeks in the past.
  17. No but Bears fans demanded a rebuild and a stark change from Pace without realizing what that might mean. Overinvesting in defense while ignoring the offensive line isn't a "stark change." It's the exact same thing. Oversimplification, but also, the stark difference was actually pointless surface level stuff mostly, so the point still plays.
  18. No but Bears fans demanded a rebuild and a stark change from Pace without realizing what that might mean. You’re right I did not think a rebuild included sabotaging last years 1st round QB I mean literally this was always a risk. It wasn't his guy.
  19. No but Bears fans demanded a rebuild and a stark change from Pace without realizing what that might mean.
  20. Not gonna lie I'm enjoying Bears Twitter imploding. I already been through the stages of grief and tried to tell anyone who would listen lol.
  21. So who's your top 7 heading into tomorrow? My hot take top 7 (not necessarily in order) George Pickens Bernhard Raimann Logan Hall Dylan Parham Skyy Moore Jalen Pitre Roger McCreary But I'm not sure I'm so confident in the difference between 4-7 and what would probably be there like 10 slots later. Sooo trade down?
  22. Ultimately some good players will fall at other positions so I'm good. And I'm gonna laugh laugh laugh at the people who didn't believe on spending in FA and just knew they could precisely fill every need with picks 39, 48, and 71.
  23. Its not a terrible bet. 3T is the only affirmative thing Poles has really shown was a priority.
  24. Missd the tic tac toe tweet. I mean, we all assumed Zach wasn't super bright already right? :lol: it IS the ultimate competitor story - it's win, or nothing. draws are losses. don't you get it? Ah I didn't interpret that way.
×
×
  • Create New...