The problem I have is that a sac bunt lowers the odds that the Cubs score that inning (i think), and your asking it from a person who hasn't had a sac bunt in his career and also has an over .500 SLG % for the season. This is the part I take issue with most. The miniscule percent difference (while I'd rather they go the way the numbers say to go) isn't what bothers me so much. Plus, Kyle (I think - or maybe it was Wilco...too lazy to look) made a good point the other night in that those percentages are also set up by the fact, for instance, that a bunt is expected a lot of times in those situations, so the surprise element in hitting away, for instance, probably plays somewhat of a role. Had they bunted with Theriot or something, I probably would've been *meh* with it, instead of irate.