Jump to content
North Side Baseball

David

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    32,475

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by David

  1. David
    As for that first part... what does that even mean? "The only reason they managed to finish 4th and win 86 games is because they were lucky enough to have an unbelievable season."
  2. David
    They won 86 games. They WERE good. The only reason they finished 4th is because they played in an awesome division. They didn't "go away". We just were lucky enough to have an unbelievable season. If they win 86 games again this season that means they're probably in the division race right to the end. I don't think they'll be as good as last year, but I think it's ridiculous to ever write that team off at this point. They're the Cardinals. lol there it is
  3. David
    http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x208/samck4/Cutler/cutlerpass.gif
  4. David
    http://www.chicagobears.com/news/NewsStory.asp?story_id=5713
  5. David
    Come on, dbags... nobody wants to discuss this win? http://www.sawauto.com/uploader/up1/Milton%203.gif
  6. David
    http://www.sawauto.com/uploader/up1/Milton.gif Next time you're going to sub for defense, Lou, put Fuku in RF.
  7. David
    Let's do this. :D http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/6225/DSC_0275.JPG
  8. David
    I'm sure I'm not the first to say this, but I would've done Gathright for Bradley... Fuku to RF
  9. David
    Plus a lot more people are on here during the day at work.
  10. David
    no one wants to come in here after you guys ruined these threads last season this
  11. David
    looks like Z is gonna bat
  12. David
    Yea... it was announced last summer, IIRC.
  13. David
    he threw strike 3 twice
  14. David
    I'm so glad to have baseball games to watch again...
  15. David
    I'm liking the all blue caps on the road.
  16. David
    I'll take it!
  17. David
    lol you can't help yourself If ANY Major League pitcher keeps falling behind every single hitter, more times than not he's going to pay for it. Try pulling your head out of your butt long enough to understand basic baseball. woosh
  18. David
    WTPLee
  19. David
    Fun game so far.
  20. David
    SORI!!!!!
  21. David
    Assume Harden goes down for a significant amount of time and we are forced to add Shark to the rotation. Name one team in the Central that will have a better rotation than the Cubs. Also, name one Central team with a better starting lineup than the Cubs. Go ahead. I'll be waiting patiently for your reply. Using PECOTA, if we give Harden's 155 innings to Shark, the Cubs starting rotation (Z, Lilly, Dempster, Shark, and Marshall) is projected to have a composite ERA of 4.76 over 845 innings, while the Brewers starting rotation (Gallardo, Suppan, Bush, Parra, Looper) is projected to have composite ERA of 4.45 over 800 innings. So, according to PECOTA, the Brewers would have a better rotation. Clearly, there is no NL Central team with a better lineup than the Cubs, but that wasn't the argument. The fact is that inserting Shark instead of Harden gives back every bit of advantage the Cubs have in the rotation and, according to PECOTA, gives the Brewers the better rotation. I'll be waiting patiently for your patronizing reply. ugh, the Shark is a pitcher Pecota just has no idea how to properly forecast. and i hope i don't have to explain the utter impossibility that Lou would have patience enough to give 150 innings to a guy with a 6 ERA The correct response.
  22. David
    There's no stat debate. It's not about gut feelings. Do you see what I'm saying here? I'm not arguing with you about the fact that the possibility exists that the Cubs could lose and the Cardinals could beat us out for the division. I agree with you on that. It's a fact. They could. That says nothing, however, about which team is better. The Cardinals are not better than the Cubs. That's blatantly obvious. holy christ, way to go around in circles... never did i say the cardinals are better than the cubs... You either said that, or you said that their rotation is better than the Cubs if the Cubs lose Harden. Do you realize what the Cardinals' rotation looks like?
  23. David
    if it's not completely 100% obvious, i'm being sarcastic. just covering my butt.
  24. David
    Yea I also always like the "well if so and so gets hurt the Cubs are screwed". I guess when that person gets hurt Hendry isnt allowed to go out and find a replacement, or to find an upgrade during the season. This roster you see now is I guess what we will see for all 162 games according to some. "lol but you can't count on players we don't have yet you idiot"
  25. David
    lol
×
×
  • Create New...