i still don't understand why the bookmakers are so high on SF. they opened the offseason as the WS favorites, IIRC. do they think the betting public is gonna buy into the even numbered year "trend" THAT much?
[tweet]
[/tweet] USA Today predicting 101 wins for the Cubs i'd be really horsefeathering annoyed if we were a 101 win team and had to wait until the final week to clinch our division also if that freaking cardinal team wins 97 games
Maybe your robot eyes automatically sort that, but add some code to that [expletive] so it's readable. don't really know how to mess with the table formatting and it was hard enough to post from my phone. if you do, please feel free.
between the older clips, comments from the FO about tapping into more of his power, and the pics of what mallee specifically seems to be working on with him, it seems like a pretty decent bet.
Won't really be fair that the entire NL starting lineup AND home run derby team will be filled with Cub dong smiths we are so outdoing that 2008 team on this this year
heyward has, in fact, been working on stuff with mallee http://m.cubs.mlb.com/news/article/164350502/jason-heyward-getting-to-know-hitting-coach http://www.bleachernation.com/2016/02/12/jason-heyward-already-in-arizona-working-with-his-new-hitting-coach-and-bp-video/
shouldn't that be 240 for 30? This seems pretty unnecessary. Unless they actually interview OJ. Not sure if it was A & E but somebody already made a pretty good documentary about OJ as well as the civil trial. I think it's called OJ: The lost tapes or something like that. 30 for 30 meant 30 episodes/documentaries for ESPN's 30 year anniversary...but then they just kept the title for the subsequent volumes/seasons even though it wasn't the 30th anniversary anymore but yeah that does seem way too long
Eh, I'm not sure who is to blame there. Is CBS supposed to be aware of every blogger who might Tweet out a pic (especially if it's already a somewhat known blog that Tweeted out Arguello's pic seemingly without crediting the source)? It's not like it's hard to hit re-tweet. It's actually a lot harder to Tweet that pic out without linking it to Arguello's Tweet. and i think everyone here knows how not a fan I am of Arguello's work