he wasn't bad. he was fine. good is pushing it (in terms of his overall tenure), and i love/loved him. No, he was good. Had the talent to be great. His tenure here was definitely flawed. Wouldn't consider THAT to be good. But, I do think it could have been, as they inexplicably failed to surround him with anything remotely close to a full puzzle. you're saying you wouldn't consider his tenure here to be good? so you agree? the fact that he had some nebulous unfulfilled potential doesn't really change what he was.