How so? I’m sick of every left handed hitter being a 3 True Outcomes hitter because they can’t beat the shift. People keep saying “well they should just adjust then” but i mean I think if they could they would have. Maybe when an entire generation of hitters has been developed to go the other way we can see some meaningful adjustment but even still, try going the other way on a 100mph inside fastball. Most sports have some rules about how offenses and defenses are aligned. Not sure the up roar about it. I’d be ok with a shift that requires the defense to be on the IF dirt. It’s just so unnatural to have an infielder camped out in short right field and unfairly neutralizes LHH who already have a disadvantage as most of their batted balls go toward the side of the field they are running towards This is pretty much exactly where I stand on the shift. I didn’t WANT to want to ban the shift. But I’m so sick of left handed hitters being handcuffed by it. Everybody loves to say that they should just go the other way, but there are fielders there, too, also standing exactly where theyre most likely to hit it. And theyre being pitched inside. These are the very best left handed baseball players in the world, if it was that simple for them to just change their approach to beat the shift, they would have done that in 2010 and the shift would be obsolete now. You have to do it carefully. You can’t ban bunt defenses, you cant ban “infield in” or “no doubles outfield”. Just restrict infielders to be positioned within the infield dirt or closer, meaning you can have infielders in front of the dirt but not behind it, with two on one side of 2nd base and two on the other. You might have to be a little more restrictive/creative than that, forcing the defense to be a couple feet away diagonally from 2nd base (restricting a fielder from positioning directly behind 2nd base) but it should be relatively simple to implement and regulate and its mostly how the game was played prior to ~2009