That's not even close to a good comparison. do explain. vitters is somewhat of a project whose trade value, if he pans out, is likely to be highest 3 years down the road when he's continued to hit well into AA. wieters is a known commodity who is likely to come in and destroy minor league pitching right away. wieters offers more trade value on the open market at this time, which is something that should be very important to a "built to win now" team like the cubs. Admittedly, when I made the first post I was under the impression LaPorta wasn't drafted until the late teens, but the point still applies. Vitters v. Wieters was not a slam dunk case of BPA, and drafting guys because they'll have more trade value right away is a short-sighted way to go about things. We took like 20 straight college players after Vitters last year who would have trade value earlier than a high school guy, and not too many of them have dynamite trade value right now.