Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Transmogrified Tiger

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    38,761
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    70

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Transmogrified Tiger

  1. Hideki Matsui had one good month(June) his rookie year. His line outside that month was .270/.331/.394
  2. Because Fukudome is one of the top few defensive RF in the game, and Ibanez is one of the bottom few.
  3. Many are. UZR has long been held up as the gold standard for defensive metrics, and is just now being made publicly available(although I think the version at fangraphs is a little different than the original, or at least uses a different company for the data).
  4. It's hard to tell how bad Burrell would be in RF because since his rookie year he's never played as much as an inning anywhere other than LF(and he's not good at it). I don't think he'd be a good enough bet to be better than DeRosa(or maybe even Pie depending on who's evaluating his defense) to bother with.
  5. I was surprised too. Not necessarily advocating him since he'd cost money, players, and at his age he's more prone to fall off the face of the earth(plus he's not that much of an upgrade over DeRosa, especially if Pie stole some late innings defensively and some ABs v. RHP), but he's been very solid with the bat and the glove for a few years now.
  6. Not if he keeps OPSing in the 600s. Actually, that's how good he is defensively, he's really out of this world as an outfielder. The Cubs aren't in a great position when it comes to Pie. Kosuke is going to get paid, so he gets first crack at the "disappointing left handed outfield bat that plays great defense" half of a platoon. Pie's not going to develop much as a 5th outfielder and there's no way they give him a starting OF spot, but his trade value isn't much to make it worth dealing him. JMO of course, but here's how I'd rank the output we'd get from some of the options we've heard, assuming a Kosuke/Johnson platoon in CF, and ignoring the contract they'd get. Bradley Winn DeRosa Hermida DeJesus Abreu Dunn Pie Ibanez
  7. If they aren't giving up DeRosa for Peavey why would they give him up for anyone else? It's mindbottling It's mind boggling. And it's not that they were giving up DeRosa, it's that they were going to give up DeRosa and everyone in the organization with more than one vowel in their last name.
  8. Chase Coffman wins the Mackey award, my sanity is preserved.
  9. What'd we say, 3 wins difference between Peavy and Marquis? Is it hard to imagine a 1 win dropoff from DeRosa to whoever(since we're trading Cedeno too), even if he only plays a supersub role with the addition of Bradley? Is it hard to imagine a 1 win dropoff from Marshall to Gaudin as the swingman, especially with the corresponding weakening of an already weakened pen? Plus we're giving up Pie, Vitters, Guzman, Hart, and anyone else who has an Iowa Cubs hat laying around for the privilege of Peavy's contract and injury history?
  10. agreed, plus edmonds' bat is probably going to deteriorate (like it was before it magically got good again). i won't miss watching him play OF; he was just brutally slow and that is one thing that ain't changing. Not that you were saying this, but to clarify, I wasn't trying to compare '09 Fukudome to '09 Edmonds. I was trying to see how '09 Fukudome would replace '08 Edmonds in the CF platoon. And Wade, you should take that to mean that Fukudome in CF will likely be no difference from Edmonds was last year, on an offense+defense basis. Bradley throughout his career has been an above average defensively(a conservative estimate using UZR is +5-7 runs over a full season in RF), and as we all know he kills the ball(career .359 wOBA, .397 last 3 years, .385 projected for '09).
  11. I've been on a bit of a defense kick lately, and I wanted to illustrate that losing Edmonds' production from last year isn't as big a blow to the team as previously thought. Last year Edmonds put up a .354 wOBA as a Cub. Using .328 as league average from a recent FanGraphs article, and Tango's formula to convert to runs, Edmonds was about 10 runs above average with the bat. UZR had his defense continuing a 4 year trend of deterioration at -10 runs. Since it was the largest jump in those 4 years, let's be conservative and say that he was actually half that bad, and say on an offense+defense basis Edmonds is +5 runs. Now for Kosuke. He finished the year with a .328 wOBA, exactly league average. Bill James projects a better season from him next season while Marcels has more of the same, let's be pessimistic and say he drops to .315. That makes him 5 runs below average with the bat given Edmonds' PAs. UZR has Kosuke as a +10 defender in RF. Since Kosuke's strength in RF is his range, I don't think that it would be overly different in CF, so let's say he's a +7 defender there next year. That puts Kosuke at +2 runs on an offense+defense basis. Three runs separating the two players is not really significant. Given that we were generous to Edmonds' defense and pessimistic to Kosuke's offense, there's reason to believe that simply inserting Kosuke instead of Edmonds into the CF platoon makes us better off as a whole next year. Also, for anyone who's curious, Pie is probably a +15 CF, and as such needs to be about a .301 wOBA to equal Edmonds at +5. To compare across statistics, Marcels projects Pie for a .310 wOBA, and a .251/.317/.389/.706 slash line.
  12. Who do you replace them with? Hart, Cedeno, Atkins, Guzman, even Pie may not have a ton of value to other teams, but 1) they asked for them for a reason, and 2) the Cubs already weak system has no one to pick up the slack for them in the organization. It's one thing to not care if one of them goes in a deal, it's another to care if they all go, it's how you end up with Les Walrond pitching in meaningful games or Joe Simokaitis getting meaningful at bats. kevin hart and ronny cedeno weren't necessary in meaningful games last year, so i don't think their replacements would be this year. They will when you've traded away Marshall, Marquis, Guzman, Atkins, and DeRosa too, that's the point.
  13. Who do you replace them with? Hart, Cedeno, Atkins, Guzman, even Pie may not have a ton of value to other teams, but 1) they asked for them for a reason, and 2) the Cubs already weak system has no one to pick up the slack for them in the organization. It's one thing to not care if one of them goes in a deal, it's another to care if they all go, it's how you end up with Les Walrond pitching in meaningful games or Joe Simokaitis getting meaningful at bats.
  14. Who is playing 2nd when that happens? Depends on who else is on the roster.
  15. Fontenot can play 3B too if you want a bigger bat than Cedeno.
  16. They can't kick you out of the special teams huddle when you're a gunner on the coverage team.
  17. Is that 12 player trade for real? How did the Mariners get away with that?
  18. He can't leave, how else is Towers going to get back to San Diego?
  19. With Johnson around, and Pie not showing up in the recent Peavy rumors, I don't think we're in much need for a backup OF.
  20. Where did Hermida come from? And who is better ... Hermida or Bradley? Hermida can actually play for us and not just sit on the DL . . . so Hermida. Teach me about Hermida, I feel like I'm missing something. He had a great year in 07, his first full year, but was pretty awful last year. His slugging and OBP took a big hit. Was there a reason for that, or are we just hoping to buy low and hope he returns to form? Hits well away from his home pitchers park, still very young, outstanding minor league track record. The fact that he was down a bit last year means he'll just come a little cheaper hopefully.
  21. I only saw the last 5 minutes, but Curry was unbelievable. His release is lightning quick.
  22. Yikes. You'd think the manager with the "power pitching" fetish would be happy to see Marshall go in exchange for Peavy. it kind of pisses me off that lou tries to act like the gm so much. "i want this"... "no wait... i want this".... "wait, i want that other thing again". just let jim do his job Stop believing everything you read.
  23. If that's what it takes to insert Marquis in a trade for someone instead of Marshall, it's a sacrifice I'm gladly willing to make. I'd much rather indirectly pay Marshall 4 million than Marquis 9 million.
×
×
  • Create New...