I would prefer to trade Eloy to Schwarber. Even if it was Schwarber, I probably wouldn't target an OF though, you're still looking at 3 spots to fill and Zobrist, Baez, Happ, Almora, and Jay to fill them. If you're going for SP+ from the Rays, you might as well go for broke and try to get Colome. I wonder if there's any indicator at how trade costs scale with increasing value. Like if you keep asking for more stuff, is there a natural discount that you end up with because it's too hard to properly counter that much value? Or maybe more succinctly stated, is trading for Archer and Colome much cheaper than separate trades for Archer and Colome? If it were much cheaper, why would Tampa even do it? A two player deal is probably a bad example of the concept. What I'm driving at is that despite everyone's best efforts, trades aren't a matter of swapping two dimes and a nickel to get a quarter, since no one values the coins exactly the same way. Given that truth, the more value you add to a trade, the higher the chance of inequity since there are more potential mismatches in valuation.