It's difficult for me to look at the bullpen and not conclude that it's fine, especially from a roster construction sense. The output is good, the underlying performance is fine(they're more middle of the pack in terms of FIP-based stuff), and the most important pieces are doing their part. Kimbrel is outstanding, Chafin has been good, Wick should hopefully supplement the back end of the pen before too long, and there's either good outcomes or room for optimism in several other spots getting sorted. The rotation's results have been less good, but I don't think I'd say 'no velocity/good control' was the goal. For one, every team in baseball would want Hendricks in their rotation, and for another Alzolay has plenty of velocity. The rest is a function of: 1) not being given any money to spend, which both made trading Darvish an option and limited the market of what they could acquire 2) the post-pandemic season's uncertainty about workloads(and lack of farm depth) causing them to value durability, which is generally negatively correlated with stuff/velocity 3) being at an uncertain point in terms of the position player core's status beyond this year, which makes longer term commitments(either via trade, FA, or prospect) to risky assets(read: pitchers) an even riskier proposition A number of these circumstances/problems are of their own design, but I also don't think it's fair to say they sat down in November and said "yes, finally we'll get to build our dream rotation of soft tossers", it's a logical outcome of (IMO) reasonable ideas to make the most of the current situation.