The Cubs are 6th in SB and SBA, and 4th in BsR, the idea that not trying to steal third base with Candelario(who was a whisker from getting picked off 2nd on the first pitch) is emblematic of them being overly conservative and leaving runs on the table on the bases is absurd to me. He has never attempted a steal of 3rd as a big leaguer. With his mediocre speed (56th percentile sprint per Statcast) Candelario's SB are basically all crimes of opportunity, taking advantage of neglectful pitchers and defenses. That's the opposite of the current situation, because even if they don't suspect Candelario of trying to steal, they're going to be not only positioned to hold his lead to play Madrigal but they want to keep him from getting a head start since they hope a poor bunt gives them a shot at the force at 3rd.
I said it in the game thread, but that plate appearance posed the choice of either hitting Madrigal or a catcher, a DP is a real risk and given Madrigal's bat control, probably greater than that of a failed bunt. Yes, Morel isn't the paragon of contact behind him, but you're still lowering the bar for both him and Hoerner/Happ to tie the game and take the lead. I can accept that some people might prefer some other permutation of decisions for various reasons, though I do think fans of a certain age have overcorrected on bunt hatred when teams *must* have one run as opposed to old-school managers bunting with their 2 hitter in the 1st inning. But stealing 3rd is not a high percentage play, bunting is certainly not an objectively bad one, and letting Madrigal or a catcher swing away gives you a most likely outcome of Morel stepping to the plate needing to do even more than he needed last night, at which point he's still the point of failure for the inning's success and not the decision in the previous PA.