Larussa has always put defense behind the plate over offense, as most rational people would. Steinbach in his day, was fair with the bat, but was counted on more to be solid behind the plate. I think this has just filtered down throughout the Cards organization. Molina will never be a good hitter. Anything he provides will just be an extra that wasnt counted on before. Old school baseball managers think the C, SS, 2b, and CF should be able to provide solid defense and range above all else. The New school from Moneyball thinks you should throw all that out the window and go for Ripken types at all positions, which is why Izturis catches so much flack around here. And then there are some of us who mix and match, playing both sides against the middle. Who is to say who is right and who is wrong? Larussa won a championship last but that doesnt necessarily make the moneyball arguement less valid. Two interesting philosophys both with their valid and invalid points, both struggling for overall acceptance. Makes for lively debate and good commentary.