Butterscup1679666578
-
Posts
30,292 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Butterscup1679666578
-
and Meph's erection grows
-
please stop.
-
Florida: 38 Alabama: 14 Oklahoma: 65 Mizzou: 31
-
Haha, did anyone see this on UT's "Campus Watch" page? http://www.utexas.edu/police/campuswatch/archives/report.php?date=Dec+01+2008
-
our team would be Soriano-Dempster-Zambrano.
-
I'm pretty sure we're going to put up some points, but Bradford's hand is the only avenue to the game being close at the end. Hopefully they aren't as effective without much ability to go under center, and if Mizzou can get around the line and hit Bradford a few times, maybe he gets knocked out of the game by landing on that hand or something. If that happens ask yourself this...Is the Oklahoma back up QB any good? I've never seen him, but if he's at least OK can Mizzou horrid D make it a closer game if Bradford gets knocked out? I was wondering this too. IMB, any insight to your backup?
-
I'm pretty sure we're going to put up some points, but Bradford's hand is the only avenue to the game being close at the end. Hopefully they aren't as effective without much ability to go under center, and if Mizzou can get around the line and hit Bradford a few times, maybe he gets knocked out of the game by landing on that hand or something. I said this to my friend this week - we're going to need to score points on D/Special Teams, and when we're on offense, we need to control the football. I want Washington getting 25+ touches. If there's even a chance of us winning, it's not going to happen if our D is on the field more than our O.
-
best move so far this offseason
-
will Rickey Henderson make HOF on the first vote
Butterscup1679666578 replied to NewUserName's topic in General Baseball Talk
im just gonna leave this here http://www.faniq.com/blog/The-25-Best-Rickey-Henderson-Stories-Of-All-Time-Blog-15243 -
boy, this offseason has the potential to be a complete disaster.
-
I wouldn't think so. I always felt that the reason we were trying to get a third team involved is because we didn't want to give up Vitters. Edit: guess i'm in the minority, haha
-
Intriguing.
-
I hate giving up Vitters, but when Peavy is on the table, you do it. Get this ownership crap figured out and lets get this done.
-
Cubs Sign Chad Fox
Butterscup1679666578 replied to Tim's topic in MLB Draft, International Signings, Amateur Baseball
epic. -
I hate Andy MacPhail, that a$$clown can never make up his mind. I can't believe he was in charge of the Cubs for so many years. One has to wonder how much of it is due to the owner. Angelos is a schmuck.
-
wrong. To be considered one of the greatest bands of all time, you need more than 3 good albums, with a 5 year window of good music making. That's more than most musicians get, to be certain, but I'd not rank them in the top 10 musical acts of the '90s, let alone of all time. But that seems to be where some would want to rank them. I heartily disagree. To each their own I guess, but to say a band that made four albums in seven-year span of the 90's that went platinum (including one that went 4x platinum, and a double-album that went 9x platinum) and had albums peak at #1, #2 and #3 on Billboard wasn't one of the greatest of their era is kind of crazy, IMO. Commercial success is an inaccurate measurement of "greatness." Titanic is the highest grossing movie of all time, after all. I just think there were many bands from the '90s who were as good, if not better, even if they didn't achieve the album sales of The Smashing Pumpkins. While I completely agree and knew you'd say that, there's not really another good way of measuring success in an era IMO. It'd all just be opinionated, like your post.
-
http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081202&content_id=3698518&vkey=news_mlb&fext=.jsp&c_id=mlb pretty f'ed up
-
wrong. To be considered one of the greatest bands of all time, you need more than 3 good albums, with a 5 year window of good music making. That's more than most musicians get, to be certain, but I'd not rank them in the top 10 musical acts of the '90s, let alone of all time. But that seems to be where some would want to rank them. I heartily disagree. To each their own I guess, but to say a band that made four albums in seven-year span of the 90's that went platinum (including one that went 4x platinum, and a double-album that went 9x platinum) and had albums peak at #1, #2 and #3 on Billboard wasn't one of the greatest of their era is kind of crazy, IMO.
-
Week 14: Jaguars (4-8) at Bears (6-6) Noon CBS
Butterscup1679666578 replied to UMFan83's topic in Other Sports
Jags are really bad, but it would be very Bear-like to lose this game and virtually end the season. -
Hopefully Eberflus gets that Toledo job. The Alamo Bowl is garbage. I can't believe Nebraska is going to get into a better bowl than us. What's even more garbage is that 9-3 Northwestern is going to end up in the Alamo bowl, and 8-4 Iowa (whom Northwestern beat -- on the road) will go to the Outback Bowl. Wealthy fans who don't get to go to bowls every year travel well too! 9-3 Missouri is going to end up in the Alamo Bowl, and 8-4 Nebraska (whom Missouri beat -- on the road -- by 35) will go to the Gator Bowl. We're in the same boat.
-
wow, this move is indescribably bad.
-
Mizzou hasn't faced a defense as good as Iowa's all year. You think Iowa's defense is better than Texas'? I don't really think there's much difference between the Alamo and Holiday, and personally I'd rather play a Big 10 team than a Pac 10 team. I certainly thought Mizzou was Holiday Bowl-bound. I also think it's a better bowl. I've heard Oklahoma State has already accepted the Holiday Bowl bid. According to a Holiday Bowl representative who was at a Mizzou game earlier this year (this was after we lost to OSU and Texas), the Holiday Bowl was ours to lose. I guess we lost it. San Antonio ... San Diego, what's the difference I'm sure the SIDs I work with feel the same way...whoops.
-
Mizzou hasn't faced a defense as good as Iowa's all year. You think Iowa's defense is better than Texas'? I don't really think there's much difference between the Alamo and Holiday, and personally I'd rather play a Big 10 team than a Pac 10 team. I certainly thought Mizzou was Holiday Bowl-bound. I also think it's a better bowl. I've heard Oklahoma State has already accepted the Holiday Bowl bid. According to a Holiday Bowl representative who was at a Mizzou game earlier this year (this was after we lost to OSU and Texas), the Holiday Bowl was ours to lose. I guess we lost it.
-
Hey neat, Mizzou got 6 votes in the AP poll.
-
Hopefully Eberflus gets that Toledo job. The Alamo Bowl is garbage. I can't believe Nebraska is going to get into a better bowl than us.