I certainly think that a lost 2012 with a wave of deadline selling was what the FO envisioned as the likely scenario. Having said that, with the roster that left camp (especially the rotation), it was within the realm of possibility that the team could have been in or around contention. Had that been the case, do we still think they would have scrapped the whole thing? It's irrelevant at this point and all of this argument is conjecture anyway, but I still don't see how there was a total commitment to losing in 2012, given the way they operated in the offseason (imo, the plan that would have maximized return while ensuring a lost season would have been to deal Garza, Dempster and Marmol prior to the season, given what they knew at the time). I think they took a bit of a gamble, hoping their potentially salable assets would perform well, but that the team as a whole wouldn't, so they could justify the sale. And with the exception of Garza getting hurt, it did (though Garza's value isn't going to be anywhere near where it was pre-2012, so that turned out to be a pretty big snafu).