Your use of hyperbole is staggering. You KNEW Nomar was going down FOR THE SEASON, because he always goes down and he's made of glass? Wow. Are you sure about that? From '97-2000 he never played fewer than 135 games. In '01 he missed almost the entire season. He played 156 games in '02 and 156 games in '03. Last year he played exactly half a season (81 games). So in his 9 career seasons coming into '05 there were only 2 seasons where he played less than 135 games. But you're right he's made of glass and always goes down. :roll: Again, Hendry had a solid closer in Spring Training in Dempster. Many here were comfortable with Hawkins starting the season as closer because he had always been an effective reliever in the past. Like I said as far as middle relief, I'm glad he didn't spend the big bucks. Relievers are incredibly inconsistent and for every Dustin Hermanson you name I can name 10 who have flopped after getting a big contract. Why not dump Remlinger until now? Maybe because he wanted to see if he could still pitch. Early on he was effective when used properly. I already adressed your bogus claim that Nomar is made of glass and has never stayed healthy. Again name me one backup SS who was available and better than Neifi. That's all I'm asking. Don't use that "Cubbie Kool-Aid" condescending tone with me. That's the last thing I'm doing and the last thing I've done all season. You beat me to it on the Nomar issue. As for the Dempster issue, he didn't have to be in the starting rotation in April, because Rusch wasn't. Dempster should have been the closer from day one, as Hendry wanted. Had that been the case, you'd have had Rusch in the rotation (remember how pitched as a starter early in the season?), Dempster as the closer, with Hawkins and Fox (blame Dusty for that one too) setting him up. Having that scenario over the one that actually happened would have seen the Cubs win at least 6-7 more games in April/May, IMO. The resulting bullpen fallout from Fox being lost for the season, Hawkins being ruined be a repeat failure as closer, etc. has almost certainly cost us more games since then. IMO, the following other Dustbrained moves have also cost the Cubs games: Batting his two worst OBP guys 1-2 for a month when Derrek was at his hottest. Walker was back, and should have been the lead off man, without a doubt. Sticking with Hollandsworth for over a month when he was slumping horribly. Dubois, while not what many thought, could have done better. Keeping Perez in the everyday lineup in June/July when his production was below acceptable for even a 25th man. Cedeno could not have possibly done any worse. Although it is impossibly to quantify, I would estimate the above moves cost the Cubs between 5 and 6 games, combined. I agree that Hendry could have improved the bullpen in the offseason, but if the pressure to get rid of Sosa was coming from the top, he really did the best he could with the OF, as sad as that is. People gripe about the leadoff man, but Walker would have been above average in that capacity. And as crazy as it seems now, most people were quite pleased when Baker was signed. So Hendry hasn't done his best, but Dusty has really compounded any problems. The bottom line, IMO, is that the 2005 team as it was constructed with injuries figured in, run as Hendry thought it should be, would have won 12-15 more games to this point, conservatively. The story of the 2005 season has been one of moderate personnel problems, and severe mismanagement issues.