It's much more than semantics in this case. MLB hosing Zell is one thing. Hosing the 19,000 employees of the Tribune is quite another. I'm assuming what is good for Zell is good for the shareholders in this case. Both would want the best price for their stock, no? I agree. Which is why I think MLB is in a tough spot if it denies a significantly higher bid from Cuban. The ownership complicates the situation for MLB in favor of Cuban's bid, particularly when many of those shareholders have a direct voice in the media. Imagine the political fallout if we find out that Cuban bid $1 bil. and MLB accepted Canning's bid for $700 mil.? Significant fallout. Especially given the tone Zell is using when speaking with Tribune employees: http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/columnists/sam-zell-chicago-tribune,1,6025237.column He's talking about the very survival of the business. I would think both Zell & the shareholders would take the idea of a cut in price for their most prized asset very, very harshly. Especially since, let's face it, we're talking about satisfying the vanity & ego of other MLB owners here. If I'm in control, I'm going crazy over the idea of losing millions of dollars because some idiot owner of a MLB team doesn't want to deal with a person who isn't part of their little "boys club."