Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Soul

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    44,479
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Trade & Free Agent Rumors

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospect Rankings

Chicago Cubs News, Rumors & Analysis

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Chicago Cubs Fan Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Soul

  1. If these first couple weeks are any indication, then I'm for Theriot getting the 2B job, DeRosa to the bench. Murton hits 2nd, Izzy 8th. If Theriot struggles DeRosa is always there.
  2. Expendable perhaps, but not irrelevant. If he were pitching well, he'd be a great trade commodity at midseason. I personally hope both Guzman and Prior put Marquis in the pen, and then off the team via a midseason trade. This would be the scenario I envision as well, assuming Prior continues to make progress and Marquis does what he usually does... I would certainly hate to see Guzman get traded just because Marquis is making the money.
  3. Vance, I vehemently disagree. I don't think he's expendable. Marquis is likely going to blow up this season. Those 5 starters: Z,Lilly,Marquis,Hill,Guzman -- will not put in an entire season of great pitching. I just don't see any way Prior will be as good a pitcher as Guzman is right now in 3 more weeks. That flies in the face of logic & reason. Guzman's stuff is looking very good right now, and he's still getting ready, improving even more. Prior is basically doing pitching calisthenics on the mound.
  4. Yes, he's working on his arm strength and stamina. Right now he's throwing a fastball and a curve, just trying to locate and be consistent. There's just no way he'll be a better option than Guzman in 3 weeks. I still think it's to early to say Guzman is the better option in 3 weeks. If it gets to be March 20th and the difference in Guzman and Prior are the same then I say AG is the man. I just think we need to wait two weeks before that decision is made. I'm not saying Lou should announce a decision. I'm just voicing doubts that Prior will be able to make up that much of a gap. Guzman looks to be seriously gearing up. All that remains with this kid is his mind. The stuff's there.
  5. It would be a stretch to think Prior will be a better option in only 3 week's time over Guzman, who is presently throwing 95 MPH heat, a wicked curve, and hasn't even bothered to break out his best pitch (change) yet. Guzman needs to be that final starter. Mark can figure things out and provide relief if and when Marquis collapses.
  6. Yes, he's working on his arm strength and stamina. Right now he's throwing a fastball and a curve, just trying to locate and be consistent. There's just no way he'll be a better option than Guzman in 3 weeks.
  7. Though I'm not panicing over Prior, I don't see any way he would be better by opening day than Guzman. Guzman should be the #5 out of ST, IMO.
  8. My reasons for not switching to DirecTV don't really have anything to do with DirecTV. And it was MLB's decision to go exclusive with DirecTV. I'm sure DirecTV is a good product for those people who receive it. I just don't want it. How good or bad of HD service on cable provider or another offers doesn't concern me because I haven't bothered to go out and by an HD tv yet. That time is coming soon though. Because I have internet, phone and tv all through the same company, I need something more than MLB EI to make me go through the hassles of switching to DirecTV. Especially since it would likely cost me more to have DirecTV. At this juncture, DirecTV has ponied up the cash, but their exclusivity only comes into play if Dish and In Demand elect to play MLB's game. Well, I hope they do then and you get the package through cable. Just as long as it doesn't stop DirecTV from offering all the extras (which, IMO, are the *real* innovation behind Sunday Ticket). Bringing a scoring-threat channel, quick highlights, more HD, and selection channels to MLB would just be the bomb.
  9. Have the Bulls had a close game in Florida this year? The TNT announcers were saying something about that on the broadcast. First Heat game, blowout Bulls win. 2nd Heat: blowout Heat win. Orlando last night: blowout Bulls win.
  10. If he made the team out of spring training he would sit the bench nearly every day. IMO that would be horrific for the kid. Let him work on his hitting @ Iowa. Maybe I'll make the 5 hour drive down there to see him early this season.
  11. I don't think it should be THAT black and white, but I do understand what you are saying. There are times that the pitcher really isn't to blame for the runs that score, so I still want a little accuracy when viewing the stats of a game. Differentiating between ERA and runs given up in general are useful stats, but don't really tell the whole story. As a team, yes, all runs scored count. No doubt. Doesn't matter how they score. I generally agree with the sentiment. The biggest problem I see is the subjective judging of what constitutes an error. I suppose it should more or less even out over the course of a long schedule.
  12. This is the crux of it for me. DirecTV just does a much better job of this than cable (or Dish for that matter). They'll add extras, put more games on in HD, innovate the package -- something cable just never does. I'd like to use my HDTV as much as possible. If DirecTV offers more HD programming, I'm definitely purchasing this package. Too bad cable does not have the capacity yet to offer more HD channels. Perhaps some of you who are angry could write your cable company and ask them politely to get off their arse. The rest of the world is moving forward, with or without cable.
  13. I guess on Chicago Tribune Live tonight Woody's career will be over too.
  14. He wasnt as rated as high as he is now because of his recent combine. This draft was done before the combine and i dont think accurately projects what his value is now, running a 4.53 helped out a lot. Lotsa good LB no doubt in this draft. Timmons would be a fantastic pick if he slips. I don't see Timmons making it that far, but that would be a no-brainer at 31, not to mention 37. Really? I'd like to see Angelo avoid replacing Briggs with first-round money, especially since he's going to lose Briggs over money. As long as we're cutting a guy because we aren't going to pay him, it seems to make more sense to try to replace him with the same sort of high-value, low cost player.
  15. Given home court and health, I think the Bulls can beat any team in the East in a 7-game series. Agree. I fully expect them to win a minumum of 1 series. I guess I'd consider that "doing damage". They're sitting at 5 right now. I don't think it's reasonable to assume home court at this point. They have home court right now because they have a better record than the 4th seed Toronto, and they are closer to the 3 seed than losing that home court advantage over the Raptors. Perhaps, but there are still games left to be played. Like I said, home court can't be simply assumed right now.
  16. I also like Harris, but from what I'm hearing he's not being rated all that high in the draft. I think he'll slip to at least the 3rd round. nfldraftcountdown.com has him listed as a mid-round pick. Edit: I really wonder if Lawrence Timmons will slip to that #37 pick we've got. That would be perfect for Briggs' replacement.
  17. I'll agree with that. I don't know that it rules out Adrian Peterson. Jamal could still be a very productive running back, but the likelihood is he should split time with somebody. If they draft AD, the two could split time and the backfield is set for years to come. I find that to be highly unlikely.
  18. Given home court and health, I think the Bulls can beat any team in the East in a 7-game series. Agree. I fully expect them to win a minumum of 1 series. I guess I'd consider that "doing damage". They're sitting at 5 right now. I don't think it's reasonable to assume home court at this point.
  19. If we want to look on the bright side, Prior never got that huge money, long term deal, so no matter what happens we won't be saddled with massive deadweight for years & years. There will always be other options out there, other ways to build a dominant pitching staff.
  20. Of course you said the Bears had no chance against the Seahawks, so I think we can all pencil the Bulls in to the NBA Finals. :D 8-) I'd be happy to be wrong. Do you honestly see this team doing damage in the playoffs?
  21. I call it foreshadowing. Indications of things to come in the playoffs.
  22. ......just gonna wait for another 2 ST starts. That's all.
  23. They may have sold out, but there wasn't that many bodies in the seats. That's right. Fans finally pulled the plug on this thing. Then suddenly the Cubs are signing the top FA in the market -- for the first time that I can remember -- then they're outspending everyone in baseball, even the Yanks and Bo Sox. Looks like a pretty direct cause/effect situation to me.
  24. You are simply wrong. 2004 spiked because of 2003 results. 2005 stayed high because of 2003/2004 results. Attendance spikes in the years following the playoffs. Additionally, tickets sales were in party driven by the huge profit margins on the secondary market. Fans had very high expectations in 2005 based on the relative youth of the core. By 2006 however, people started taking a bath on unused tickets. They sold out early, on higher expectations, but butts in the seats was clearly lower. And they would have stayed lower in 2007 had it not been for huge offseason investment. Explain the '87 - '93 flap then. Should 15-20 year old attendance figures really be used to classify the current fanbase's mentality? I'm saying no such thing. I've already said current Cub fans are expecting more, and showing a renewed willingness to express their displeasure.
×
×
  • Create New...