Sorry, I missed your post, first time through.... There is WAY TOO much whining about DeRosa! Did I like him? YES, very much. Will the Cubs miss him? At times, probably. But with the Cubs determined to balance the lineup he would have diminished playing time and would have been very unhappy. He was a great fit for either the Twins or Indians, and he was paid too much to sit on the bench, when, unlike Fukudome, he could be profitably traded, and MOST of his usefulness could be replaced by a switch hitter who is much cheaper and two years younger. I thought most of the DeRosa complaining was because of who we replaced him with (Miles) not because of losing DeRo himself. It's a little bit who we're replacing him with (Miles) and a little bit what we got for him (very high risk, very young pitchers). I was fine trading him, but I thought we could get more for him by selling high. And then we use half his salary to sign a guy who would be decent as a strict bench player. These days if you are trading salary, you seldom get high value prospects, because everyone is trying to conserve cash and protect their young players. So if we couldn't get good value, we weren't selling high, so we shouldn't have traded him. We made RF a little better (allowing the signing of Bradley) and made second base much worse with the trade. Unless we get Peavy (which you're assuming and I'm not ready to yet), this was a horrible trade. The risk is in them developing. If they don't, we traded DeRo for nothing. And there's a pretty good chance, given their skill sets, that they don't develop. I've said it numerous times before, if the trade ultimately nets us Peavy, I'll feel a whole lot better about it. If it doesn't, it was terrible.