Hamilton's perceived value was in the toilet when we drafted and traded him to Cincinnati. He wasn't on Tampa's 40 man roster when he was taken in the rule 5 draft. Whatever elite prospect status he had when he was originally drafted was gone when he got back from his narcotic binge. Once again, not every player that makes it to the bigs was labeled an elite prospect. What you are basically saying is that because Randy Wells was never given this label, we should dump him while we have the chance. I happen to disagree with that notion. I'm not saying he can't be traded. I'm just saying that he's currently more valuable than a bullpen arm and if that's all that anyone is offering for him, you might as well keep him. Sometimes it's okay to keep a guy when his value is at an all time high. You just never know who might be the next Sammy Sosa or Greg Maddux. I'm not saying Randy Wells cannot be a good major league starter. I'm saying the likelihood is very low that he will be one because his stuff is only average. He may be great, but the chances aren't particularly high. Before this season, the general consensus, it seemed, was that he'd barely make a starting staff. Maybe everybody was wrong and this current success will continue, but it's unlikely. If he pitches at this level the remainder of the season, then sure he's more valuable than a bullpen arm. But I'm arguing that going by his average stuff he's unlikely to keep up this success as teams see him more. The likelihood is that his effectiveness will begin to go down, perhaps to the point that he's much less valuable than a bullpen arm. If all it took to have great trade value was a few good outings, Jake Fox would have incredible trade value right now. But he doesn't because teams consider both current production level and the likelihood that the current production level will continue. For Wells the current level of production isn't likely to continue.