Well, it depends on when he got hurt. Supposedly the new belief is he got hurt on the first play of the 2nd quarter. And while he wasn't great in the 1st, he was better than his performance in the 2nd. But no, we probably don't win the gmae if he stays in. And then the media virtually ignores his injury in order to rip him relentlessly for not being a big game player. It was a no win situation, so honorably he made the decision that benefited the team the most. What a selfish turd. Cutler didn't play so great, true. But there's no way a healthy Cutler doesn't give them a better chance of winning than 3rd stringer Caleb Hanie. If anyone believes that, then they should also believe the Bears should just promote Hanie to starter. And the fact is that Hanie wasn't that far from winning the game. So yes, of course I think they could've won with a healthy Cutler the whole game. After all, the Pack looked like they were going to blow us out in the first quarter and Aaron Rodgers looked like the best QB ever for a while. But he certainly didn't finish that way. No reason to think that Cutler couldn't have played the second half better than the first. But sadly we'll never know.