Neuby

Bruce any chance you can get Hendry to do a Q and A with us?

My cyber money says that Murton is tired. I wish these games were on TV. With Murtons 4-4 today I bet your glad your betting with Cyber money :lol:

If Ramirez was offered to the Cubs for Patterson, Williams, Hill, Walker, and picked up half of Ramirez contract would u do it? As good as Sizemore is Manny Ramirez is HOF that still produces so paying him less than you would have to pay Giles with the amount of holes the Cubs have would be worth it.

The Cubs cannot trade Rusch w/o his permission until June and why in the wide, wide world of sports would Toronto take the Cubs trash for Vernon Wells? I think the Cubs can trade Rusch whenever they want since he never went to free agency although I agree that Jays would never do that trade.

No way we get Sizemore for Walker . Reports out of Ohio had the Indians calling the Phillies and Boston looking for Thome or Ramirez, the Indians backed away because in order for either team to trade Thome or Ramirez while picking up some of the check they wanted Sizemore and prospects or Sizemore and Lee.

The Cubs have enough cash for Furcal , Giles , Burnett and Lofton they have at least 40 million . The bullpen will need to come from trading some young arms.

bunch of crap. Sneed knows nothing.

Re-sign nomar, sign Dotel, Sign Burnett, Sign Giles, trade for Bradley, Trade for Manny. I wish Hendry would follow my MVP baseball moves.

wow looks like everyone can put the pitch forks away now that Glendon has been promised nothing and could still be bumped out of the way for Burnett or Millwood.

Maybe go after a CF (Bradley/Cameron) with those extra starting arms we have, but I agree.. LF - Murton CF - Patterson (Bradley? ) RF - Giles 1B - Lee 2B - Walker SS - Furcal 3B - ARam C - Barrett To me, that lineup looks good enough to compete for the division. Amazing how much of a difference 2 signings would make. I think with Giles and Furcal, we could afford to let Patterson try one more time in CF. The line-up could be: Furcal SS Walker 2b Lee 1b Giles RF Ramirez 3b Patterson CF Murton LF Barrett C I think that line-up could conceivably be a top 3-4 offense. We could afford to let Patterson try again in center field but I would rather not chance it. Go and Get Bradley the Dodgers are in dump mode. Forget Furcal and get Nomar on the cheap. Walker Bradley Lee Giles Ramirez Nomar Barrett Murton man I wish the Cubs where the Yankee's and could replace Murton with Dunn, Manny, Floyd, Matsui.

It depends on what Hendry decides to do with the bullpen, with the rotation, the bench, and his current players. What if he extends Lee? How much will he set aside if Aramis opts out or if we need to swing a deadline deal? There should be enough to spend on both, but only if Hendry properly prioritizes the needs on the team. The Rusch contract may be proof that he still will overpay for bench/backup players that aren't worth it. assuming there's really one bullpen spot left up for grabs , possibly a rotation spot, there should be plenty left both for Giles and Furcal if the Cubs payroll is 105 million but I think it will be higher with the new revenue streams the Cubs are bringing in.

Gee, Brian Cashman will be surprised after he just signed a 3 year deal. Depo has no chance there. He's has no people skills according to all reports and that won't fly in Boston as the GM. with the feud between Larry Lucc and Theo don't be suprized if the Boss dangle an offer for an assistant job too Theo

Depo will take over in Boston and Theo joins the Yankees just a hunch.

I always thought Roger was a bit of a goofball and a flake never saw him as a pitching coach.

What if Nomar cost 4 million or less than another 5 or so in incentives? With Cedeno backing up is that a slam dunk answer.

I would love either Burnett or Millwood, if the Cub go crazy and spend a ton this winter I would think Burnett is the one they would land. Why? Dempsters a good friend. Was in the Marlins system when Gary Hughes was there. Barrett has thrown him a sales pitch. Burnett has shown a desire to play here according to reports on the board. One I'm not sure about was Rothschild with the Marlins when Burnett was there. But with the Rusch signing I just don't see Hendry going after another starter even if Williams is dealt for a bat. I hope Hendry proves me wrong.

If Hendry plans to trade Patterson which I think he does I hope he lets Atlanta keep Furcal and help us reunite the Giles Brothers with Patterson as bait. Lofton 1.5 million Giles 5 million B.Giles 12 million Dotel 3 million Nomar 4 million spend the rest on some bench help or trade for another starter like Livan Hernadez. Wouldn't Millwood look great in Cubbie Blue?

whats the story in Giles shoulder? I thought I'd heard that was robbing him of some of his power also. Furcal and Damon? I'd rather have Nomar and the Giles brothers. Nomar and Manny for a pipe dream.

Vance, don't the Cubs have to wait a few weeks before Hendry can begin negotiating for Giles? I thought there is a 2 week window after the WS where current teams have exclusive negotiation rights to their own FAs. :? Right. 14 days after the W.S. As soon as that window opens, though, I'd have my offer ready and pick up the phone. Would you start at 4/50? I wouldn't. I'd be willing to go there no problem, but I wouldn't start there. I would, only because it lets him know we are dead serious about signing him. I think best case scenario is Furcal and Shuerholtz strike a deal in the 14 day period-triggering a trade of Marcus Giles(5) to the Cubs for Walker(2.5)+R.Hill-Wuertz. Marcus in the fold gives us a LEGITIMATE shot at Brian Giles-Sign Giles to whatever he wants-(4/40) Trade JWilliams+Cpatt(2.5)+Mitre for Pierre(5) and Mota(3)- Re-sign Nomar(5M) to play SS- sign AJ Burnett-4/40(9,10,10,11) Go to War with that- CF-Pierre(5) 2B-M.Giles(5) 1B-Lee(9) RF-Giles(10) 3B-Aram(10) SS-Nomar(5) C-Barrett(4) LF-Murton(.3) (48.3M) Prior(4) Z(6) Maddux(9) Burnett(9) Wood(10) (38M) Mota(3)-Dempster(5)-Rusch(2.5)-Ohman(.4)-Williamson(2)-Novoa+JVB (12.9M) Hairston(2)-Blanco(1.5)-Cedeno(.3)-Greenburg(.3)-Branyon(1.5)=5.3M 104M team-and WOW- I am willing to bet the Cubs are gonna have a payroll closer to 110-115 this year . I think you overspent on Nomar I am thinking his base will be closer to a 4 million. Drop Pierre and Mota spend the money on Dotel instead and Lofton to keep center field warm . I am assuming you give Lofton a starting job and the chance to play for in Chicago and Baker again you can get him 1.5 million. Leave Greenberg in the minors for awhile longer and spend some more of that money on another strong right handed power hitter like Sanez.

Not good enough. Need one more quality late inning reliever here, IMO, even with Dotel on board. With all our money this year, no reason not to add Howry or Eyre to your list, and subtract Novoa (who I think is trade bait anyways). No reason not to whatty what? Novoa has major league stuff (a big heavy fastball that comfortably hits the mid-nineties and a hard late breaking slider), and as such his excellent K (9.5 K/9) and HR (0.8 HR/9) numbers in his first year with the Cubs are hardly a surprise. Furthermore, the control problems that plagued him in 2005 (5.0 BB/9) were somewhat out of character based upon his entire minor league career, where at no stage did he ever walk more than 3.2 per 9 innings, although those numbers were primarily put up as a starter. He also suffered a .333 average on balls in play against in 2005, so it would hardly come as a surprise if that dropped in years to come. All in all, I feel pretty safe in suggesting that Novoa is not very far from becoming a very fine reliever, though it somewhat pains me to say that given I detested the Farnsworth trade. If Novoa's the fifth best reliever in our bullpen, we have absolutely no problems in the bullpen department whatsoever. Oh, and Novoa will next year earn league minimum. Bob Howry isn't a bad pitcher. But demand for his services this winter is going to be out of all proportion with his actual abilities as a reliever. The guy has two very good fastballs, a four-seamer that he hits the mid-nineties with and a two-seamer, and now he controls both of them extremely well, but beyond that he doesn't really have anything, and that's a significant problem. It meant that in 2005 he only managed to record 48 strikeouts in 73 innings, and so the reason that he allowed just 49 hits was not because Howry was restricting balls in play, but because hardly any of the many balls in play turned into hits: hitters hit just .215 on balls in play off him. .217, .296, .253, .312, .274, (2003), .267, .215 Those are what hitters have hit off Howry from year-to-year. See a pattern? No, I didn't think so. That's because from year-to-year, with the sample sizes so small, the numbers jump around, up and down, and that's why buying on a reliever after he's had an out of line good year really isn't that great an idea: his next year's perhaps more likely than ever to be the regression to the mean bad year. All in all, for his career, hitters have hit .268 on balls in play off Howry, or the equivalent of 11 extra hits on top of Howry's 49 in 2005. Prior to 2005, hitters had hit .278 on balls in play off Howry, equivalent to another 2 hits on top of the 60. And Howry's home run rate in 2005 was comfortably his best ever, at the age of 31? Something tells me that's headed upwards too, especially if you move him from Jacobs Field to Wrigley. Tag on a couple more homers as well then. All of a sudden, you're talking Howry being about 15 hits of which say 3 homers lucky this year. You've got to believe that that made a huge contribution to his ERA, not to mention keeping inherited runners from scoring. Good for the 2004 Indians. Not necessarily any good at all for whoever then goes and slurges a sizeable investment on him. Scott Eyre? Are you frigging kidding me? He has completely average stuff (bleh fastball, plus-ish slider), and his numbers through the age of 32 were absolutely atrocious, never once featuring a strikeout rate of anywhere close to one an inning, a walk rate much less than one every other inning, only once featuring a balls in play against of less than .270 (and that was in 2004). Are you trying to tell me that one decent/flukish year in a pitcher's paradise in the worst division in baseball changes at the age of 33 changes that to the extent that you'd throw money at him and move a talented young pitcher like Roberto Novoa to make room for him? Please don't get the impression that I'm opposed to the Cubs spending money: I want them to have a payroll in excess of $105m next year. There are just far far better ways off getting to that figure than depositing it in the bank accounts of one-year relief flukes, particularly if we have better in house options, and that's what the situation with Howry/Eyre/Novoa represents. What other names did Neuby throw out there? Sauerbeck? He throws nothing but junk, I'll take my chances with a proper pitcher. Gordon? Great arm, but extremely old and criminally overworked in these last few seasons, almost guaranteed to break down soon. Mota? We'd have to trade players to get him, he's expensive, and he's coming off a terrible season. Definately worth a shot then if the Marlins are giving him away and selling low on a quality arm. Basically, I'm not seeing anyone out there that's worth the money/years given their age and ability all relative to what we already have, besides BJ Ryan that is, with Guillermo Mota an idea worth exploring. The problem going into next season counting on Dotel and Williamson heavily is that they will have the Cubs medical team. I love both if healthy high reward , low risk. But counting on them to BOTH remain effective and healthy is too much risk. Thats why I advocate getting another proven arm Seanz would be a cheap option, Howry gets peolpe even if it's just with fastballs he still gets them out. Might come at a discount to return to Chicago. I still think Nova or Wuertz is dealt in a package for a big bat.

Had the Cubs had Giles in RF instead of Burnitz, we would have been 5th in OBP instead of 13th. That alone speaks of his value. The window is closing. I don't think we have the luxury of passing on the only impact OF because of his age. We can be fiscally responsible in fourth place or we can overpay for the player than immediately improves the line-up. I choose the later. Manny

I'm waiting for the word from Hendry or Glendon on what kind of role he was promised. For 3 million he won't be a bad second lefty out of the pen that provides insurance in the rotation and long relief.

Not sure what the def of a groundbreaking player is but Furcal is 27 , switch hitter, a 15 homer , 40 steal guy, with some of the best range at short in the majors to go with a cannon arm at short. I'm not sure if Cedeno's ceiling is anywhere near that high.

How many more years can Manny keep hitting like this? How old is he I can't remember? He'll turn 34 in May , Giles will be 35 in Jan. Doesn't Giles have a suspect shoulder? Hairston/Lofton Walker M.Ramirez Lee Aram Nomar Murton Barrett Me like.

did I mention Manny hit 417 in the world Series? If Dusty is the manager he is supposed to deal with guys like Manny. I would have put up with all of Sosa's antics had he kept producing like Manny. Manny is a once in a generation type player.