Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Thusly Boned

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    1,791
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Thusly Boned

  1. Yeah, but also some blame for not walking away sooner, perhaps. The team ended up with decent enough returns for those two, but I felt at the time that the core was sold off a little too late.
  2. I don't hate it, I just don't care enough about this particular matchup to outweigh my amusement at the silly people sent into apoplexy by all the attention the Swift/Kelce ting is getting.
  3. I'm a little wary of what the cost might be there, given his age and contract status. I'd love to have him, but I'd be surprised if whoever trades for him doesn't overpay.
  4. I can't believe Campbell passing on points and going on 4th there; if I'm a Lions fan, that's gonna gnaw at me for a loooonnngg time. Well, since I definitely won't be watching the superbowl, I hope they talk about Taylor Swift non-stop all game, and cut to her between every play just to piss the meatheads off. Maybe advertise it as the Taylor Bowl.
  5. Yeah, right or wrong, it's patently obvious the team didn't like what they saw in Mervis, and don't plan to give him a major role. Trading for Busch and all but naming him the 1B was the final nail in the coffin in my mind.
  6. No idea if it would be feasible, but make it so all owners have to share their financials with the league, set a payroll/baseball ops budget floor for each team that is a fixed percentage of their revenue, and if they don't meet that payroll/baseball ops budget floor, penalize them the difference. So they end up spending the same regardless. Like a reverse luxury tax.
  7. Yeah, there is a little bit of taint on that 2016 team, tbh. In retrospect, part of me is glad Chapman blew the lead in game 7 so I didn't don't feel like we won because of him (but that's probably just cope). But Shannon is the star of the current Illini team; if they were to win anything of great significance this year, it's almost certainly going to depend in large part on him, and I hate that now. Should he be able to play until there is some kind of disposition? Maybe. But he absolutely shouldn't be lionized.
  8. That's true, but it's not a binary either. Dumbass college kids most often simply aren't going to have the same level of self-awareness (with regard to biases among other things) that many other people have. That's not an absolution, it just is what it is. It's still gross for them to cheer him, but maybe incrementally less so than say, one of their professors doing it or something. Regardless, the whole production is really disappointing, and it's scenario we see way too much of.
  9. I think it's reflection of confirmation bias and how cult-like sports fandoms can be. That's not a defense of anyone, but a condemnation of sports fandom in general. Unfortunately, it seems to be nearly the status quo for communities around teams/organizations/schools in situations like this to circle the wagons, at least until the guilt becomes undeniable (and sadly often beyond that point). We've seen it countless times. And I hope it didn't actually happen, but odds are something bad did. And as an Illini fan, unless we get a pretty categorical retraction from the victim, anything positive that happens that Shannon is involved with is going to have the stank on it.
  10. Ryno was my favorite athlete as a kid; my room was practically a shrine to him and the Cubs. I definitely don't feel the reverence for him now that I did when I was tween, but this still really sucks.
  11. Yeah, and a lot of that delusion stems the extreme confidence that comes naturally, and a lot is they're drinking the kool-aid their agents are serving. But most of them aren't rocket scientists, either. Owners are another thing. I think they should be compelled to spend, at least at a level that correlates to their cash flow. For the health of the game, craven profiteering should be dissuaded.
  12. Well, the things Fields doesn't do well are well documented, and have been for a while. Nothing you've said any any point hasn't already been said multiple times by dozens of analysts at any point over the past couple of years. And there are numerous people on this board who demonstrably know more about this stuff than you do. You also have to remember where you are posting - you're in a game thread, where people are being reactionary and irrational. You can't come into these, be insanely repetitive, negative, and I-told-you-so-y and then be surprised when people tell you to f off.
  13. The problem is that you're not remotely the only person who saw these things, and none of your insights have ever been revolutionary. You're just really insufferable in pointing out the obvious repeatedly, and always going the extra mile to needle people and exaggerate Field's faults. People don't rag on you because you're right and they don't like it, they rag on you because you instigate an think you're being clever about it. You're not. Stop playing the victim here.
  14. I think they should probably all go, but if I had to rank these three in terms of who needs to be put out the airlock, this is how I would do it: Getsy Getsy Getsy Flus Fields Getsy should go regardless of what they do at QB. But I agree that if you are going to get rid of any, you should just dump all three.
  15. No, it has to be that you're an angsty Bears fan with no self awareness, because it can't possibly be that Kyle doesn't know what he's talking about, or is just running an inane bit to get under people's skins. The reality is that people can stomach the clown show when the Bears aren't losing, and actually say what they're always thinking when things are going really poorly.
  16. Both things can be true. This is absolutely bad for the sport, but there is not a firm correlation between spending a crapton of money and World Series wins. It does suck a lot of the fun out of the regular season, though. I suppose the only positive is the schadenfreude when a team like the '23 Mets horsefeathers the bed. In a better world all these owners would just spend their money on their teams, but we don't live in that world, and what the Dodgers are doing is really exasperating. And while I won't pretend I wouldn't be mostly cool with it if the Cubs were the Dodgers in this story, it would feel slightly dirty. Like being a fan of an NBA superteam. Parity makes everything more fun.
  17. I'd be surprised if it's not the Yankees. I think they just need him most, particularly after putting so many eggs in their offensive basket, and specifically in 2024, and at the expense of what was already a less than deep pitching staff. I think there's huge pressure on them to add top shelf pitching.
  18. All are still in our system, I believe, but breathing is about all they're doing.
  19. Apparently the Giants were shown the exact same terms the Dodgers got, and they were amenable to it, but he chose the Dodgers anyway. It was only going to be the Dodgers, the rest was barely more than a charade. And there is a ton of circumstantial evidence/reporting out there that Ohtani simply wasn't going to play in NYC, almost regardless of anything else. I mean he probably wasn't ever leaving SoCal, but he was never going to the East Coast. I think I read that the Mets didn't even get a cursory phone call from Ohtani's agent. We never really heard any serious linkage between Ohtani and the NYC teams, and it's because he just wasn't at all interested in dealing with that scene.
  20. I think most people want the Cubs to be aggressive on players with relatively low risk, and not so much on a player who feels like he is as likely to turn back into a pumpkin as not. Bellinger feels iffy enough that he's definitely not who you'd want to have as the centerpiece of your offseason. At least to me. Plus signs seem to point to a late signing for Bellinger, and if we're adding him mid-January, that likely means a lot of stuff has gone wrong, and we're overpaying him more out of desperation than calculated risk. And yeah, all the people aren't going to be pleased regardless, but that's nothing new.
  21. Rey played for the Cubs the first 6 years of his career, I'm pretty sure, 1996 was probably his best year with the team. Advanced defense metrics weren't what they are now, but I think he did his best defensive work after moving to he AL. But yeah, statistically a great defensive SS.
  22. That much is patently obvious now, particularly since it has been reported the deferrals were his idea. He wants to win, and really only wanted LA. Does it make him a heel? I don't know, but it sure it irritating that the whole thing was a dog and pony show. But it also was what a most people were assuming (that he really only wanted to stay in LA).
  23. The O'Reilly thing is definitely what I got right away, fwiw
  24. It seems to me that the only thing that is clear here is that very few people (if any, outside of the FO) has any idea what is going on here. Even the most connected people seem to be fumbling around in the dark on most fronts. Thing might turn out very badly, but I am reserving all judgement until things actually start happening, and we're a good bit further down the road. "Reading the offseason" seems laughably futile at the moment.
×
×
  • Create New...