I was thinking about this while I was driving home from work, and I've got a couple different things to say on the issue (i'm not at all promising, though, that they will lead to one coherent conclusion) 1. Catchers ERA is...well...I dont want to say bogus, but not completely fair. If a catcher is a bad pitch caller...well okay... but the pitcher does have the right to shake him off. So it's not entirely the catchers fault, as a pitcher has the final say in which pitch is thrown. 2. Many complained that Barrett's lack of offense rendered him useless because he was obviously an offensive catcher, rather than a defensive one. But, looking at these numbers: Non-Barret Cubs Catchers: .157/.228/.241 Barrett 2007 (CHC & SD): .253/.300/.412 Even when Barrett was having a terrible offensive year, by his standards, he was still hitting the hell out of our other catchers. So, the question becomes, is the upgrade in defense really worth the automatic out in the lineup? I'm not so sure it is. Plus, on an unrelated note, it really pisses me off that Barrett is taking blame for the Z dugout incident. He obviously (we have it on tape for crying out loud) didnt do anything, aside from pointing to the scoreboard, to provoke Z's attack. And on top of that, both Barrett AND his teammates said that he was only going to the dugout to make amends when Z went at him again. I love Z, but this is on him. Not Barrett. EDIT: Also, an interesting side note. Even though Barrett's avg/obp is pretty anemic (again, by his standards), he is on pace to beat/tie some of his career highs in offensive categories. For example: -He is currently on a pace to hit 21 HR. His Career high is 16 (He's done that for 3 straight years now) -He is on a pace for 70RBI (i know, totally team oriented). His career high is 65. -He is on a pace to hit 23 doubles. He hit 25 last year (though his career high is 33) -He is on a pace to get 139 hits. His career high is 131. not sure it means anything..but..interesting.