No it isn't. Sorry. You have to be kidding. Not at all. There have been multiple steriod reports to come out, to date, and he hasn't appeared on one. The best evidence they have against him is when someone allegedly overheard him talking about what he'd do if they banned amphetamines - something that has been used in baseball for decades. The only evidence anyone has is that he bulked up after a couple of years in the big leagues. Which of course could have nothing to do with the fact that he went from being a mal-nourished teenager from the dominican republic to a well-known gym-rat when he made it to the big leagues. It's interesting - and this is something I didn't know until last week: My biology&physics of sports professor was talking about the effect of steroids in class the other day and apparently any amount of muscle/bulk that steroids help you build can be built by just spending hours in the weight room. So - basically, having freaking massive arms (which, sammy did) does not mean he used roids. It would however mean that he had to spend an absolute ton of time in the gym. Which seems to be exactly what everyone says about him. So is there a reason to suspect he did roids? Sure - there's a reason to suspect everyone in the past 10-15 years has roided up at some point. But to this point there has been absolutely zero credible evidence against Sammy, so it's just as reasonable to say that "hey, maybe he didnt"