For those three to "succeed" they will have to be competent relievers in the big leagues and mediocre catchers (unless Petrick goes back in the rotation). In a prospect ranking, you have to consider ceiling too, otherwise it's really nothing more than a list of guys who are more likely make it to the big leagues. I see nothing wrong with Gallagher or Veal being ranked ahead of Colvin (and I guess I can see the argument for Soto, but I'd disagree) but Petrick and Blevins are future big league relievers. Probably never, considering he's slowed down big time from his start and given his mediocre stuff. I guess thats why i disagree with some of the rankings. 'Ceilings' i think are valued too much. Middle relievers hardly ever get any recongnition but yet have solid productive careers. And i wonder how much of this ranking has to do with his draft slot the year before. Many publications and people considered Colvin a reach, and now with a so-so year + he is 60? I dont get that.