Donaldson is 21 in short-season ball. Colvin is 21 in AA, 3 levels ahead. Colvin held his own against monumentally better competition. I dont' see how you can say he's a non-prospect but Donaldson is great because of similar numbers (wihtout the walks) at Boise as Colvin. Also, you can't mention Ceda without the walks. If those numbers you listed were the whole story, everyone in baseball would be talking about him. Donaldson at 21 in Boise .346/.470/.605 35/37 Colvin at 20 in Boise .268/.313/.483 17/55 Colvin did pretty well in Daytona this year but I wouldnt say what he did in AA was good. So really Colvin is a year younger and 1+/2 levels ahead of him. Its hard to get excited about him with his numbers. Again maybe he has all the tools that is talked about and i might like him better than what i see on paper. Ceda-Yeah yah i left out the BB's :) Yes if his BB were good he would be talked about everywhere. I was pointing out the stats that make him 'interesting'. If he had good BB/IP ratio, yeah he'd be in the 'exciting' category. He's 20 and has 'stuff' stats, I think that makes him an interesting prospect.